Monday, June 6, 2011Massive Drain of Comex silver/almost all gold and silver at comex settled by paper
Good evening Ladies and Gentlemen:
There is a lot of stuff happening today so please read everything today very carefully.
Gold closed today up $4.80 to $1546.50. Silver which for most of the day traded up by over one dollar
lost some of its steam late in the comex session to close at $36.77 up 58 cents. It had traded well north of 37.00 dollars during the early comex session.
Let us go to the comex and see how trading fared today.
First the gold comex:
The total gold comex OI rose today by 4311 contracts from 503,511 to 507,822 which of course is basis Friday, the day of the lousy jobs report. The banking cartel provided a lot of non backed paper gold trying to suppress its rise. The front delivery month of June saw its OI fall from 5442 to 4257 for a loss of 1185 contracts. We had deliveries on Friday of 980 so we lost 205 contracts to fiat settlement. In the body of the commentary I will reveal to you astonishing data which seems to suggest that all the comex gold and silver are settled by paper.
The next front month for gold is August and we saw the OI rise from 331,378 to 336,027 which is quite normal as we quite away from first day notice for the August contract. The estimated volume at the gold comex today was 105,382 which is quite tame. The confirmed volume on Friday, was very good at 160,386.
And now for silver:
The total silver comex OI fell by 1683 contracts to 121,606 from 123,289. Silver OI seems to be trading within a small band hovering around 121,000 contracts.
Mysteriously the front options expiry month for June saw its OI rise again from 157 to 172 for a gain of 15 contracts. There were no deliveries so the gain will increase the amount of silver standing.
We have witnessed the front options delivery month go from 115 to 187 and then back down to 157 and then back up to 172 all with zero deliveries of silver. Go figure!!
The next big delivery month for silver and this will have all eyes focusing on this is July. The OI for July fell by 2284 contracts from 57,094 to 54,810 contracts. We still have 3 weeks to go before first day notice.
The estimated volume at the silver comex today was very tame at 57,736. The confirmed volume on Friday was much firmer at 84,565.
Here is the chart for 6/7/2011 regarding deliveries and inventory changes at the comex. This is for the June delivery month in gold.
Gold Ounces
Withdrawals from Dealers Inventory nil
Withdrawals fromCustomer Inventory nil
Deposits to the Dealer Inventory nil
Deposits to the Customer Inventory nil
No of oz served (contracts) today 15400 (154)
No of oz to be served (notices) 410300 oz (4103)
Total monthly oz gold served (contracts) so far this month 335,4200 (3542)
Total accumulative withdrawal of gold from the Dealers inventory this month nil
Total accumulative withdrawal of gold from the Customer inventory this month 10,205
Let us begin with gold.
We witnessed zero activity in gold. This is polar opposite to silver which you will see shortly.
The only transaction was an adjustment whereby 796 oz was removed from a customer's inventory.
The comex folk notified us that we had a total of 154 notices filed for delivery or 15400 oz of gold.
The total number of notices filed so far this month total 3542 for 354200 oz of gold.
To obtain what is left to be served, I take the OI standing for June (4257) and subtract out today's deliveries
(154) which leaves with with 4103 notices to be served upon or 410300 oz of gold.
Thus the total number of gold oz standing in this delivery month of June is as follows:
354,200 oz (already served) + 410,300 (oz to be served) = 764,500 oz.(23.78 tonnes)
Yesterday we had a reading of: 785,000 so we lost more to paper fiat.
And now for silver:
Silver Ounces
Withdrawals from Dealers Inventory 429,567 (Brinks, Scotia0
Withdrawals from Customer Inventory 157,075 (Brinks, Scotia)
Deposits to the Dealer Inventory nil
Deposits to the Customer Inventory nil
No of oz served (contracts) today nil (0)
No of oz to be served (notices) 860,000 (172)
Total monthly oz silver served (contracts) so far this month 915,000 (183)
Total accumulative withdrawal of silver from the Dealers inventory this month 429,567
Total accumulative withdrawal of silver from the Customer Inventory this month. 1,368,765
Today we witnessed a massive exodus of silver from the silver vaults.
As Zero Mostel would say: where there is smoke there is salmon!!"
The fires are burning at all registered vaults.
The dealer saw two massive withdrawals of silver:
1. 375,781 oz from Brinks.
2. 53,786 oz from Scotia.
total silver leaving the dealer: 429,567 oz.
The customer saw this silver leaving their vaults:
1. 155,082 oz leaving Brinks customer vault.
2. 1993 oz leaving Delaware.
total customer silver withdrawal: 157,075 oz.
The adjustments were also fierce:
There were two adjustments and both saw the dealer lose silver to the customer by way of an adjustment:
1. 438,708 oz (dealer to customer) HSBC
2. 5,137 oz (dealer to customer) Scotia.
total adjusted out silver: 446,845
total registered silver at the comex has now fallen to an all time low of 28.773 million oz.
Surprisingly for the 3rd day in a row we had zero notices filed for delivery. Thus the total number of notices remain at 183 for 915,000 oz.
To obtain what is left to be served upon I take the OI for June ( 172) and subtract out the deliveries for today (zero) which leaves us with 172 notices or 860,000 oz
Thus the total number of silver oz standing in this non delivery month is as follows:
915,000 oz (already served) + 860,000 oz (to be served) = 1,775,000
we had 1700,000 oz on Friday so we gained back what we lost on Friday.
end
Let us now proceed to our ETF's SLV and GLD and then our physical gold and silver funds:
Sprott and Central Fund of Canada.
The two ETF's that I follow are the GLD and SLV. You must be very careful in trading these vehicles as these funds do not have any beneficial gold or silver behind them. They probably have only paper claims and when the dust settles, on a collapse, there will be countless class action lawsuits trying to recover your lost investment.
First GLD inventory changes: June 6.2011 :
Total Gold in Trust
Tonnes: 1,212.87
Ounces:38,994,859.03
Value US$:
60,377,085,905.50
Total Gold in Trust:
June 4.2011
Tonnes: 1,212.87
Ounces:38,994,859.03
Value US$:
60,028,109,525.60
June 2.2011:
Total Gold in Trust
Tonnes: 1,212.87
Ounces:38,994,859.03
Value US$:
59,785,707,149.22
Total Gold in Trust;June 1.2011:
Tonnes: 1,212.87
Ounces:38,994,859.03
Value US$:
59,785,707,149.22
We neither gained nor lost any gold in the GLD ETF's for each of the past 4 trading days.
Now let us see inventory movements in the SLV:
June 6.2011:
Ounces of Silver in Trust 317,822,982.300
Tonnes of Silver in Trust 9,885.40
June 4.2011:
Ounces of Silver in Trust 317,822,982.300
Tonnes of Silver in Trust 9,885.40
We neither gained nor lost any silver today.
Let us head over to our closed physical funds that we follow: the Central Fund of Canada and Sprott's gold and silver funds:
1. Central Fund of Canada: it is trading at a negative 2.1 in usa funds and negative 1.9 for Cdn funds.
June 6.2011
2. Sprott silver fund (PSLV): Premium to NAV fell to 15.83% positive NAV (June 6 .2011
3. Sprott gold fund (PHYS): premium to NAV fell slightly to a positive 3.64% to NAV (June6.2011)
end.
Max Keiser in his weekly video broadcast had J.S. Kim from Thailand discussing the comex settlements. He alerted the world that almost 99% of all gold contracts and silver contracts are paper settled. He discusses that in 2005 the comex allowed paper settlements as long as physical was somehow attached to the paper claim. There are two kinds of these paper settlements;
EFP (exchange for physical)
EFS (exchange for physical swaps.)
In essence the settlements were using SLV and GLD.
Originally the paper settlements were tiny. However in the past 4 months, the entire
settlements have been in paper SLV and GLD.
For the month of May in gold:
The settlements have been as follows:
1. cash .01%
2. physical settlements only .27%
3. 78.22% Exchange for Physical receipts.
4. 21.5% Exchange for Physical swap receipts.
total paper: 99.72%
For silver:
1. cash .19%
2. for physical delivery: .93%
3. EFP (exchange for physical) = 85.39%
4. EFS (exchange for physical swaps+ 13.49%
total paper settlements in silver: 98.88%
This is very alarming but explains everything that has been happening in silver and gold.
It will explain why there is no gold and no silver entering as a deposit.
It will explain why the OI is falling without delivery notices.
In other words, ladies and gentlemen, the comex is one big massive fraud as everything is paper settled with another fraudulent vehicle the SLV and GLD.
I will attach the entire article and I the video. I urge you to read this the paper and watch the video.
I have to leave to bring by grandson back home.
I will continue my commentary and it will be marked updated.
Banker Manipulation on Gold and Silver: JS Kim with Max Keiser:
Please find below my interview with Max Keiser and our discussion regarding the Greek crisis and continued banker price suppression and manipulation schemes executed against gold and silver to prop up the US dollar and prevent a US dollar collapse. Max raises the issue of the European Parliament’s move to accept gold from EU nations as collateral as reported on Zero Hedge here, which I believe is a step towards making gold acceptable as money for the purposes of debt repayment. However, this step is nothing new as Bankers have long been known to make loans in weak currencies and demand repayment in much stronger currencies before, even when dealing with fiat currencies. For example, the World Bank, which has long dispensed loans in US dollars to struggling nations, started a program in the early1990s whereby it asked nations to repay their USD loans in local currencies, fully aware of the fact that the US dollar was falling against many global currencies very rapidly. The World Bank aggressively instituted this “we lend you money in junk US dollar fiat currency and repay us in better currency” program in 15 different currencies in the early 1990s and aggressively pushed it further in the 2000s. So it is no surprise at all that the European Parliament has extended and refined this World Bank program for their own use into a “collateralize your debt with real money (physical gold) but continue to take out loans in our junk fiat currencies”.
I also discuss the shenanigans of the gold/futures silver market with Max. Here is the link to the evidence and the letter I sent to CFTC Commissioner Bart Chilton in late summer of 2008 of Banker fraud in the gold futures markets and his reply to me. Mr. Chilton replied that the enormous arbitrage opportunities daily for several months in the summer of 2008 of $20, $30, $40 and $50 an ounce higher prices of gold futures in Asia versus the New York COMEX was due to Chinese banker manipulation of gold prices higher and not due to Western banker manipulation of gold prices lower. You can read, in that same article, my further line of questioning of Mr. Chilton’s response that went unanswered by the CFTC. Furthermore, I discuss with Max the recent shenanigans in gold and silver futures markets where nearly 99% of all daily transactions for the month of May, 2011 consisted of paper for paper swaps in the form of EFP (Exchange of Futures for Physical) and EFS (Exchange of Futures for Swaps). While at first the Exchange of Futures for Physical transaction may sound legitimate in name, all legitimacy disappears when one realizes that paper may be substituted for the “physical” component of this transaction.
Exchange Rule 104.36 enacted on February 18, 2005, which allows for the substitution of gold ETFs for physical gold, states that the “physical” part of the transaction “need only be substantially the economic equivalent of the futures contract being exchanged” and that “the purpose of this Notice is to confirm that the Exchange would accept gold-backed exchange-traded funds (‘ETF’) shares as the physical commodity component for an EFP transaction involving COMEX gold futures contracts, provided that all elements of a bona fide EFP pursuant to Exchange Rule 104.36 are satisfied. Thus, acceptable gold-backed and exchange-traded ETF funds include, but are not limited to, the iSharesCOMEX Gold Trust (ticker: IAU), which began trading on the American Stock Exchange on January 28, 2005.”
GATA’s Adrian Douglas first brought to my attention Exchange Rule 104.36 in his article, “Commodity Exchanges Can Dump Gold Debts on ETFs”, prompting me to search the CFTC database even further. My search revealed a further amendment to the “exchange of future for physical” transactions enacted onMarch 11, 2005. This amendment stated that “for purposes of this Rule 414, the term ‘Related Position’ [Physical] shall include, but not be limited to, a security [a group or basket of securities], an option, [or] any commodity as that term is defined by the CEA or a group or basket of any of the foregoing. The Related Position [Physical] being exchanged need not be the same as the underlying of the Futures transaction being exchanged, but the Related Position [Physical] must have a high degree of price correlation to the underlying of the Futures transaction so that the Futures transaction would serve as an appropriate hedge for the Related Position [Physical].” This amendment not only opens up PM ETFs as substitutes for the “physical” component of a gold/silver futures transaction but even other metal ETFs or physical metals that have a “high degree of price correlation” to gold and silver.
Furthermore, remember that an EFP transaction can be used to either initiate or liquidate a futures position. Thus, from this amendment, though not specifically mentioned, it is obvious that SLV shares could be used in an EFP transaction to represent the “physical silver” part of a futures transaction. If you look at my below diagram, this may also explain why a huge number of spread positions in the gold/silver futures markets are initiated from time to time in the COMEX. I have illustrated how an EFP in silver futures may work below:
In recent months, the number of EFP transactions in silver AND gold, as opposed to the number of contracts settled in cash or settled in physical delivery, has exploded. When the majority of gold/silver futures contracts are settling in EFP and EFS transactions versus cash settlement or physical settlement, this points to a pronounced manipulation of this market and an absence of any true price discovery in gold/silver futures markets.
ZeroHedge recently reported that JP Morgan was one of the largest owners of the likely bogus SLV ETF, holding 3,600,000 shares as of the end of the 2010 fiscal year calendar. ZeroHedge also reported that bullion banks, in early May, moved 20% of COMEX physical silver out of the registered category that is available to satisfy requests for physical delivery and into the eligible category that is not “eligible” for physical delivery. Scottia Mocatta followed this significant move by transferring 186,000 of their physical silver ounces from registered to eligible as well. JP Morgan, as of the May 27th CME report, held ZERO ounces of registered silver in the COMEX vaults.
In the meantime, selling of SLV shares reached an all time high in May. What does this all mean? I’m not quite sure I have the full answer yet as I keep digging, but I’m quite certain that whatever is going on in these paper for paper swaps in the gold/silver futures markets on the COMEX is not kosher and an attempt to hide physical shortages of precious metals that exist versus the open interest numbers in gold/silver futures. The CME makes it very difficult to compile stats regarding EFS and EFP transactions because while they provide a running total of month-to-date transactions for gold/silver futures contracts settled in cash and settled through physical delivery, they do NOT provide a running total of EFS and EFP transactions month-to-date in their daily metal reports nor do they respond to any requests for such information. When one of my staff members wrote the CME and inquired if running totals were available each month for EFS and EFP transactions in gold/silver futures, the CME staff answered no. Thus, one of my staff compiled the daily totals for EFS and EFP transactions for the month of May by pulling every daily report for gold/silver futures. This is what the totals looked like from May 2 to May 26, 2011.
For gold futures, from May 2 until May 26, 2011, 0.01% of transactions settled in cash, 0.27% in physical, 78.22% in EFP and 21.50% in EFS (for a combined 99.72% of all gold futures transactions in EFP and EFS). For silver futures, from May 2 until May 26, 2011, 0.19% settled in cash, 0.93% in physical, 85.39% in EFP, and 13.49% in EFS (for a combined 98.88% of all silver futures transactions in EFP and EFS). Thus these paper for (possibly) paper swaps, if that is indeed what is happening in the EFP transactions, are casting huge distortions in the price of gold and silver to the downside.
About the author: JS Kim is the Chief Investment Strategist for SmartKnowledgeU, a fiercely independent investment research, education, & consulting firm that helps clients position themselves properly to profit from the ongoing global monetary crisis being executed by the world’s Central Banks. The returns of his Crisis Investment Opportunities newsletter since launch in June 15th 2007 are as a follows. Half a year, 2007: +23.78%; 2008 +3.21%, 2009: +63.32%; 2010: +32.59%; and YTD as of the end of May 2011: +5.79%. Cumulative return since launch to May, 2011: +192.66%
I will continue shortly with part II of my commentary.






Reply With Quote




history
Happy New Years Day


