obomba serving his masters with new EO

[EO 11110]

obomba, serving his masters....again

money laundering....snicker

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16914690

In an executive order, Mr Obama said he was freezing all Iranian government assets held or traded in the US.

On Sunday, Mr Obama said the US and Israel were "in lockstep" in their policy towards Iran.

Concerns have grown in Israel and the West that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, although Tehran says its nuclear programme is entirely peaceful.

The new US sanctions include blocks on the Central Bank of Iran, imposed "in light of the deceptive practices" the bank to conceal transactions already banned by previous sanctions.

The curbs were also prompted by Iran's "deficient" efforts to combat money-laundering, the executive order said.

[Ishkabibble]

The overlords use a rather heavy hand against any who fall out of favor. What will our world be like if they make the NWO official... that is, if they legitimize the upper tier?

[earplugs]

anti-semitic iran...threatening all jews aroud the world and yet leaving alone the jews in iran. how antisemitic!

[Not Sure]

I agree the war drums are beating for Iran, but in all seriousness don’t they have like one of the largest reserves of oil in the world? Doesn’t nuclear power seem kind of over kill for the ability to produce electricity? I suppose, I am ignorant to the fact this doesn’t have anything to do with Iran wanting to be a military super power. This is the issue that will cost Ron the nomination.

Why does America need nuclear power? We have decades of oil and centuries of coal.

The Iranians know that nuclear power is independence when the oil under their land runs out. If Iran wanted a nuclear bomb, they could simply have purchased one.

[Not Sure]

Link Please .... Thank You.

http://web.archive.org/web/200612050...tl/intl.3.html

Jews in Iran Describe a Life of Freedom Despite Anti-Israel Actions by Tehran
Michael Theodoulou, Special to The Christian Science Monitor

TEHRAN, IRAN—

One of the most striking of many murals in Iran's capital, Tehran, is a towering portrait of Fathi Shkaki, a leader of the militant Palestinian group, Islamic Jihad. He was assassinated by Israeli agents in 1995 after he masterminded a series of suicide bombings against Jewish civilians.

A slogan beneath his face hails him as a hero of the Islamic revolution in Palestine.

Yet, stroll a little farther along Palestine Street and you come to the Abrishami Synagogue, the biggest of 23 synagogues in Tehran. It is regularly attended by some 1,000 worshippers.

It comes as a surprise to many visitors to discover that Iran, a country so hostile to Israel and with a reputation for intolerance, is home to a small but vibrant Jewish community that is an officially recognized religious minority under Iran's 1979 Islamic Constitution.

"[Ayatollah Ruhollah] Khomeini didn't mix up our community with Israel and Zionism - he saw us as Iranians," says Haroun Yashyaei, a film producer and chairman of the Central Jewish Community in Iran. Like Iran's Armenian Christians, Jews are tolerated as "people of the book" and allowed to practice their religion freely, provided they do not proselytize.

They elect their own deputy to the 270-seat Parliament and enjoy certain rights of self-administration. Jewish burial and divorce laws are accepted by Islamic courts. Jews are conscripted into the Army.

"We are one of the oldest Jewish communities in the world," Mr. Yashyaei says. "When Muslims came to Iran, we had already been here for centuries."

"Take it from me, the Jewish community here faces no difficulties. If some people left after the revolution, maybe it's because they were scared," says Farangis Hassidim, a forceful but good-humored woman who is charge of the only Jewish hospital in Iran. She adds: "Our position here is not as bad as people abroad may think. We practice our religion freely, we have all our festivals, we have our own schools and kindergartens."

For her, the well-equipped hospital in central Tehran is a model of religious harmony. "We have about 200 staff, 30 percent of them Jewish," she says. "These days, I'd say about 5 percent of our patients are Jewish, the rest are Muslims." A sign outside the hospital reads in Hebrew: "Love thy neighbor as thyself."

Nevertheless, many Jews emigrated after the 1979 Islamic revolution to the United States, the favored destination, and to Israel. In just under two decades, their numbers in Iran have dwindled from 100,000 to about 40,000, 25,000 of them in Tehran.

The shah, overthrown in 1979, was on good terms with the Jewish state; opposition to it was a cornerstone of Khomeini's revolution.

A tight-knit community

Like other minorities, many Iranian Jews feared an uncertain future, although their religious rights were enshrined in the Constitution. Nevertheless, Iran's Jewish community remains the largest in the Middle East outside of Israel, and human rights activists confirm that members are not persecuted because of their religion.

Since the Islamic revolution, the Jewish community has become more tight-knit and devout, according to worshippers at the Abrishami Synagogue.

After prayers, there is a festive atmosphere as families, greeting each other with the Sabbath greeting "Shabbat Shalom," spill out into the courtyard. Savory snacks are handed out as families share gossip and children dart up and down the stairs playing tag. A small portrait of Ayatollah Khomeini is painted on the wall of the stairwell.

Privately, there are grumbles about discrimination, much of it of a social or bureaucratic nature. Some complain it is impossible for Jews to get senior positions in Iran Air, the national airline, or in the national oil company. A woman teacher says she has been passed by for promotion several times because she is Jewish and now hopes to emigrate to Los Angeles. A car-parts dealer says Jews have to wait much longer for travel documents and exit visas.

The most pressing complaint is that, despite many petitions to parliament, Jewish schools must open on Saturdays, the Jewish Sabbath. Like so many other Iranians, those at the Abrishami synagogue are relying on the new president, Mohamad Khatami, to support them.

"He's a kind man; let's hope he can help us with this schools question," says the parts dealer.

Jews also hope for a genuine Middle East peace settlement that would enable a more moderate Iran to recognize Israel, where many Iranian Jews have relatives. That clearly is a long way off, despite hints over the weekend of some kind of people-to-people dialogue. Even Mr. Khatami, with his reputation as a relative moderate, called Israel a "racist, terrorist state" in a recent interview on CNN television.

Contacts with the Jewish state are banned, although some visit through third countries, while mail is usually routed through London.

Why leave?

At an antiques shop in central Tehran, Isaac, the elderly owner, says many Jews who once owned shops along the broad, bustling avenue have left in the past 20 years.

He has not seen his sister since she emigrated to Israel 16 years ago, but he has no plans to leave.

"The Jewish community has been here for centuries, and this shop has been in the family for more than 50 years," he says, reeling off the famous customers who have visited. "Gen. [Charles] de Gaulle was here.

"But look at this," he adds, brandishing an old black-and-white photograph of himself with his arm around curvaceous 1950s film star Gina Lollobrigida, who sports a beehive hairdo.

"Really, it's OK here, and it's home," he says.

[snapon]

Syria is the wildcard in this, If it remains under Assad, The timetable and plans will have to change.Syria would unify quickly under a Israeli attack. Russia and China has hampered this, and now Assad has stepped up, He has a very small window to finish it.If it drags out ,the Turks will go in,and he is finished.

The reason I mention this is that Iran has to be alone before any attack comes against it.It is essential to Iran that Syria remain the focal point, at least until it can finish its defenses. If NATO sends a "Libya" force in,Russia will counter that with a force of its own(see 1967 War for precedence) That will ensure Assad's survival.

There will be no "Persian Spring" in Iran, that will have to be a full blown attack. I dont think NATO can successfully occupy Iran,without large casualties,something the public wont tolerate. Look for airstrikes only, They will try and Isolate Iran.

[Not Sure]

Syria is the wildcard in this, If it remains under Assad, The timetable and plans will have to change.Syria would unify quickly under a Israeli attack. Russia and China has hampered this, and now Assad has stepped up, He has a very small window to finish it.If it drags out ,the Turks will go in,and he is finished.

The reason I mention this is that Iran has to be alone before any attack comes against it.It is essential to Iran that Syria remain the focal point, at least until it can finish its defenses. If NATO sends a "Libya" force in,Russia will counter that with a force of its own(see 1967 War for precedence) That will ensure Assad's survival.

There will be no "Persian Spring" in Iran, that will have to be a full blown attack. I dont think NATO can successfully occupy Iran,without large casualties,something the public wont tolerate. Look for airstrikes only, They will try and Isolate Iran.

The North Atlantic Terrorist Organization cannot successfully occupy Afghanistan. Attempting to occupy Iran would result in tens of thousands of fatalities for "the West." Yes, airstrikes, almost certainly "limited" "tactical" nuclear, will be forthcoming, with nuclear strikes "justified" due to the hardened nature of the Iranian nuclear energy research facilities.

[chris_is_here]

I agree the war drums are beating for Iran, but in all seriousness don’t they have like one of the largest reserves of oil in the world? Doesn’t nuclear power seem kind of over kill for the ability to produce electricity? I suppose, I am ignorant to the fact this doesn’t have anything to do with Iran wanting to be a military super power. This is the issue that will cost Ron the nomination.

I found the blurb below on Wiki...Iran is, in fact, an importer of fuel and their oil exports have dropped by one-third since 1974....all of which suggests that Iran's oil production is no where near levels needed for self sufficiency. The article went on to describe hydro-electric and wind power initiatives, which further supports the point. With oil prices hovering at $100 per barrel, Iran probably believes it is advantageous to export their oil and supplement their own needs with less expensive alternatives.

Now, given this, I would tend to strongly believe that Iran is more motivated to build nuclear reactors as opposed to nuclear weapons - which would cost far more time and money to develop, due to the difficulty of achieving 95%+ enriched uranium. By contrast, nuclear power only requires 5% enriched uranium. Honestly, if the Iranians really wanted nukes, it would be better economically for them to just go out and buy them from a super power.

Nevertheless, the MSM will go on beating the war drums until their zionist overlords are ready to launch their "pre-emptive" strike and drag us into WWIII.

Iran ranks second in the world in natural gas reserves and third in oil reserves.[206][207] It is OPEC's 2nd largest oil exporter and it has the potential to become an energy superpower.[208] In 2005, Iran spent $4 billion on fuel imports, because of contraband and inefficient domestic use.[209] Oil industry output averaged 4 million barrels per day (640,000 m3/d) in 2005, compared with the peak of six million barrels per day reached in 1974. In the early years of the 2000s (decade), industry infrastructure was increasingly inefficient because of technological lags. Few exploratory wells were drilled in 2005.

[EO 11110]

I found the blurb below on Wiki...Iran is, in fact, an importer of fuel and their oil exports have dropped by one-third since 1974....all of which suggests that Iran's oil production is no where near levels needed for self sufficiency. The article went on to describe hydro-electric and wind power initiatives, which further supports the point. With oil prices hovering at $100 per barrel, Iran probably believes it is advantageous to export their oil and supplement their own needs with less expensive alternatives.

Now, given this, I would tend to strongly believe that Iran is more motivated to build nuclear reactors as opposed to nuclear weapons - which would cost far more time and money to develop, due to the difficulty of achieving 95%+ enriched uranium. By contrast, nuclear power only requires 5% enriched uranium. Honestly, if the Iranians really wanted nukes, it would be better economically for them to just go out and buy them from a super power.

Nevertheless, the MSM will go on beating the war drums until their zionist overlords are ready to launch their "pre-emptive" strike and drag us into WWIII.

Iran ranks second in the world in natural gas reserves and third in oil reserves.[206][207] It is OPEC's 2nd largest oil exporter and it has the potential to become an energy superpower.[208] In 2005, Iran spent $4 billion on fuel imports, because of contraband and inefficient domestic use.[209] Oil industry output averaged 4 million barrels per day (640,000 m3/d) in 2005, compared with the peak of six million barrels per day reached in 1974. In the early years of the 2000s (decade), industry infrastructure was increasingly inefficient because of technological lags. Few exploratory wells were drilled in 2005.

iran and iraq have both been oil production suppressed - if you look at their production numbers they are roughly equal and with limited growth

nyc is controlling their production through their mid east outpost (opec)

saddam had other ideas....HAD

[GodspeedMetals]

Why does America need nuclear power? We have decades of oil and centuries of coal.

The Iranians know that nuclear power is independence when the oil under their land runs out. If Iran wanted a nuclear bomb, they could simply have purchased one.

Yes, but half the fun (and drama) comes in threatening to develop one... and giving bi-weekly reports on how far off you are to having the bomb.

"We're thisssssss close to getting one and you can't stop us, neener neener."

Who is to say that this Ahmadajack@ss isn't an agent of TPTB??? What would it benefit the American puppet masters to take out little Iran? They have all the oil they need.

The show is for all of us!!

[GodspeedMetals]

I found the blurb below on Wiki...Iran is, in fact, an importer of fuel and their oil exports have dropped by one-third since 1974....all of which suggests that Iran's oil production is no where near levels needed for self sufficiency. The article went on to describe hydro-electric and wind power initiatives, which further supports the point. With oil prices hovering at $100 per barrel, Iran probably believes it is advantageous to export their oil and supplement their own needs with less expensive alternatives.

Iran does not have the refining capabilities... so when they pump the black crack from the ground, they send it offshore to get refined and bring it back for industrial / residential use.

You'd think they find a way to do it onshore by now.

[Not Sure]

I must admit a 6 year old link to some obscure webpage is hardly convincing.

The Christian Science Monitor..."some obscure webpage."

Even the article makes them out to be second hand citizens in Iran, walking a fine line keeping a low profile as not to upset the real state of affairs. As I read the article I get the feeling these people are afraid (even says so) What I like to read is something more up to date, of course when you have people being suppressed the comments would probably be about the same.

Perhaps we could ask the Jerusalem Post about the conditions in Gaza?

I'm sure we'd get an honest opinion from the happy residents there, while at the gunpoint of the IDF.

As far as buying a nuke thats ridiculous these things have finger prints nowhere in the world would a nuke be used that couldn’t be traced back to where it was made. That would be a foolish sell for any country. I understand people hate the status quo so do I, That doesn’t blind me to the fact these animals are brainwashed by the cult of Islam and have every intention of spreading it worldwide, if they had the military power to do it today they would.

There are dozens if not hundreds of nuclear warheads "floating around" out there, "missing" since the collapse of the USSR. Using one of them would "point back" to the defunct Strategic Rocket Forces of the Red Army.

Nothing anyone ever does will satisfy these people other than a world govern by the laws of that evil book.

Which book are you talking about, the Quran...or the Talmud?

One of them is "law" in America. I'll give you a hint, it's not in Arabic.

I offer my example of Iraq, lets watch what happens and base our judgment of Islam on the actions there, if there ever was hope of any kind this is the test. Once failed hopeful every nation and person on Earth will realize what we’re dealing with.

Do you know why Iraq has become fundamentalist Islamic? Because the United States overthrew the anti-fundamentalist Saddam.

Do you know why Iran has become fundamentalist Islamic? Because the United States overthrew the Prime Minister of Iran and installed the Shah.

[Not Sure]

I see no reason the Jews can’t have a justifiable amount of land to call their country.

Yeah...here:

[Not Sure]

I believe your half-truths, but my reasonable understanding and common sense keeps me from falling for every conspiracy theory around clouding up the real truth about this demonic religion.....or we call things like they really are and fight to win.

Get your gun, and GO! I don't want any part of your fight, having to sacrifice my kids for your fight, having to fund the ammunition for your fight, nor having to pay $7.00/gallon for gas for your fight.

Islam can be "turned off" at any time with one bomb on Mecca. Not so with the "other (much bigger) problem" that runs international banking and creates the state of permanent war our world is in.

[EO 11110]

I still stand by the evil comment; it’s no secret what the Islamic intentions are. All one has to do is look at the Middle East at the action of these people falling on the sword rather than ever being diplomatic. Look at the UK being challenged for survival of their system as more and more Muslims demand a change of culture, one more suited to Islamic Laws.



Yes/No ...... DAMN !! .....

bold above..

so people are supposed to believe the hyped-up claims and untruths regarding what the "islamic intentions" are......this is a thought crime that deserves pre-emptive mass murder? ideally the killing will be done by USA soldiers/weapons/money...right?

their opponent, just recently, launched a large scale military attack on houses, schools, hospitals, etc.....yet whines about others who they claim are THINKING about doing something. absurd.

your cover is blown...after just a few posts

time to register under a different name

[EO 11110]

[QUOTE=Josey;343697]Hello EO#
How about you come down off your high horse, it’s like you people don’t see or just don’t acknowledge the links I posted. It’s not untruths about the intentions of Islam; it’s a matter of opening your eyes and reading.


shall we compare body bag totals?

you (and yours) lose in a landslide (or...i guess that's a win for the bloodthirsty tribe)

scream and whine all you want....this crowd is not fooled by freshman antics

[Not Sure]

Like it or not if you’re an American it is “OUR” country at war.

The Federal regime is at war with much of the world. I have no earthly government, so it's not possible for my government to be at war with anyone.

Exactly who and what we are at war with seems to be the question. In which I answered.

The Federal regime has declared war on all real Americans.

I may have over complimented you, Reads more bitter and bias than informative.

Yup, you're just a simple, honest poster, no agenda, just making good faith comments...

the real truth about this demonic religion

[Tinbox]

To Not Sure……

I agree you’re a smart poster and very persuasive, but people need to know when to follow their gut feelings. I remember back in my younger years how racist people would preach to me out of my Bible about God’s animals that could walk and talk, about the land of nod. Even though I couldn’t argue, I knew deep down that it was just “their” Agenda. I believe your half-truths, but my reasonable understanding and common sense keeps me from falling for every conspiracy theory around clouding up the real truth about this demonic religion.
Maybe this guy should have remained in the one block Jewish section in 2006, where maybe less than 1000 Jews are allowed while no Christian tolerance is found.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...tor-sentenced/
I once again advocate these Muslim nations be left to their own doing (such as Syria) or we call things like they really are and fight to win.


Just for Chits and Jiggles ....

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/02...est=latestnews

The Evidence is all around, no matter what conspiracy you tack onto it.

your evidence is that the afghans are fighting back?

This is evidence of what exactly?

If there was a group of a few hundred crazy people in the united states who attacked china (without knowledge of the U.S. govt) and then China invaded the United States, would you not fight against the invaders? (china?) Or would you just say we deserved it due to the attack?

[Tinbox]

I agree the war drums are beating for Iran, but in all seriousness don’t they have like one of the largest reserves of oil in the world? Doesn’t nuclear power seem kind of over kill for the ability to produce electricity? I suppose, I am ignorant to the fact this doesn’t have anything to do with Iran wanting to be a military super power. This is the issue that will cost Ron the nomination.

What is the reasoning behind the USA being able to have 1,000+ nuclear weapons, Israel can have 200+ but Iran can have 0?

[Not Sure]

not threatening to wipe a peaceful country off the map.

"Peaceful country," LOL.

The IDF only drops "love" bombs.

[Tinbox]

Hello TinBox,
Fighting Back? Didn’t this monster attack us first? LOL
Evidence that these Middle East countries have no tolerance for anything but Islam, which carries aggression for anything and everything not Muslim. Yes that is the proof of my links. I have no doubt I could get more but I have opted to wait on the latest examples as they come in. (Just so this issue is up to date, which you’ll find is no different than it was 1000 years ago)



Actions, Intent, A peaceful stance or how about we’re not threatening to wipe a peaceful country off the map. These animals aren’t pushed into a corner fighting to keep from being taken over. They asked for it and got it; let me say once again I advocate leaving them to their own misery. I say give them a nuke so they can finally make a move worthy of wiping “them” off the map.

Have a good day......

so if a terrorist group of a couple hundred people based in the USA attacked China, you would be fine with China invading us, and not only invading but occupying our country for 10 years? The only way your logic makes sense is if your answer to this question is YES, so keep that in mind........

[EO 11110]

so if a terrorist group of a couple hundred people based in the USA attacked China, you would be fine with China invading us, and not only invading but occupying our country for 10 years? The only way your logic makes sense is if your answer to this question is YES, so keep that in mind........

or deluded paranoia leading to proclamations that target is thinking unapproved thoughts

[Tinbox]

If this was just a couple hundred people wouldn’t they be dead now? Problem solved. There isn’t just a few bad apples this is a way of life for Muslims, they nurture, might I even say relish in it. Calling the US Invaders or occupiers is ridiculous as America is giving these God for shaken countries back to the very people who will once again destroy it.

no apparently it takes roughly 10 years to find an old man with health issues who is moving from cave to cave supposedly. So no, they wouldn't be dead now. Sounds to me like you just hate Muslims, because your logic just doesn't add up. The Taliban DID NOT attack the USA. Al Qaeda did which was a small group founded by Osama Bin Laden. The Taliban who rules Afghanistan has no desire to attack the United States, they simply want no foreign power occupying their country.

Maybe when you get over your obvious malice directed at Muslims you will begin to see things more clearly. You obviously have something against the religion based on this sentence, " There isn’t just a few bad apples this is a way of life for Muslims, they nurture, might I even say relish in it "

[ToBeSelfEvident]

LOL at Josey who thinks Al Qaeda attacked us.