Becareful in Indiana if you move dirt around!

[Gold Rush]

Not sure if this has ever been posted here before, but a friend sent me a link to this video..thought I would post it and see everyone's opion..I agree with the home owner, and I think he used alot of restraint..if it had been me, not sure I would have been as nice, deputy or not to reintroduce her to the edge of my property line

[DodgebyDave]

With the new "right to resist law" you won't be seeing that anymore. Last week Marion County issued the edict that officers serving warrants will wear uniforms and not be in civilian clothes.

[Nickelless]

With the new "right to resist law" you won't be seeing that anymore. Last week Marion County issued the edict that officers serving warrants will wear uniforms and not be in civilian clothes.

Smart move on Marion County's part. I hope officers in general use common sense so they don't get shot.

It sounds like the guy who filmed this video knows the law. Good for him.

[DodgebyDave]

Smart move on Marion County's part. I hope officers in general use common sense so they don't get shot.

It sounds like the guy who filmed this video knows the law. Good for him.

The Health and Hospital Corporation is a municipal corporation authorized by the Indiana General Assembly to exercise legislative powers in addition to its executive agency powers. In other words, the Corporation, by its Board of Trustees, has the power to enact legislation. Further, the Corporation has the power to enforce the provisions of the legislation it enacts. The legislation enacted by the Board of Trustees and currently in force covers three general areas: environmental regulation, communicable disease regulation and corporate and administrative matters.

I have been a couple of rounds with this crew meself. They ain't that tough. You can use their own stuff against them and they squeal like boiling lobster when you do.

[Gold Rush]

Have you read the wording on that new law? Senate Bill 0001
2012 Second Regular Session


Latest Information



DIGEST OF SB 1 (Updated March 9, 2012 11:49 pm - DI 106)
Self defense. Specifies that a person may use reasonable force against any other person in certain circumstances. Provides that a person is justified in using reasonable force against a public servant if the person reasonably believes the force is necessary to: (1) protect the person or a third person from unlawful force; (2) prevent or terminate the public servant's unlawful entry into the person's dwelling; or (3) prevent or terminate the public servant's criminal interference with property lawfully in the person's possession. Specifies that a person is not justified in using force against a public servant if: (1) the person is committing or is escaping after the commission of a crime; (2) the person provokes action by the public servant with intent to injure the public servant; (3) the person has entered into combat with the public servant or is the initial aggressor; or (4) the person reasonably believes the public servant is acting lawfully or is engaged in the lawful execution of the public servant's official duties. Provides that a person is not justified in using deadly force against a public servant whom the person knows or reasonably should know is a public servant unless: (1) the person reasonably believes that the public servant is acting unlawfully or is not engaged in the execution of the public servant's official duties; and (2) the force is reasonably necessary to prevent serious bodily injury to the person or a third person........... It seems to me, the way that new law is written is,if you make a move to say hey you can't do this or that..all bets are off, because now the officer can say he believed you were making a threating move or you were the initial aggressor????

[DodgebyDave]

That's a great point GR, the law isn't worded for squat. Lawyers giving other lawyers words to play with.

[Gold Rush]

That's a great point GR, the law isn't worded for squat. Lawyers giving other lawyers words to play with.

when I seen Daniels had signed it, I was troubled by his and Owensby comments and decided to take a closer look at the new law.....

"Contrary to some impressions, the bill strengthens the protection of Indiana law enforcement officers by narrowing the situations in which someone would be justified in using force against them," Daniels said in a written statement. But, he added: "What is troubling to law enforcement officers, and to me, is the chance that citizens hearing reports of change will misunderstand what the law says."



"For those who don''t take the time to read the law, it is going to be devastating for someone to think they have a right to resist if they only think an officer is acting illegally," said William Owensby, president of the Indianapolis chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police..

[GOLD DUCK]

QWAK,I ran an independent APRASER that works for the county off my property last spring when he wanted to check my cabin for future TAX purposes.

I told him NOT to come back inless he has a paper that stated the LAW that autherised him being here and exactly how the VALUE of the property would be established.

I told him IF he did he MAY get shot in the FOOT as I don't want to kill any one but would be OK with making some one LIMP for a long time!

I did the same thing about 15 years back and the county DOUBELED my TAXES but later lost in court and had to rebate the excess tax $$$ back to me and all the others they tried to STEAM ROLL!

People get SOoooooooooooo full of them selves when given a little authority it is AMASING --- like a BALOON or a PIMPLE that needs POPING!

the DUCK