Obama Won 108% of Registered Voters in Ohio County

[Goldhedge]

Voter Fraud: Obama Won %108 of Registered Voters in Ohio County

Let’s face it. Obama won the election. Just like Putin and Ahmadinejad did theirs. The only difference is that unlike Iranians and Russians, Americans won’t be gathering in the streets to protest their disenfranchisement at the hands of the corrupt Democratic Party machine.

First, he received over 99% of the vote in districts where GOP inspectors were illegally removed. Next, he won 100% of the vote in 21 districts in Cleveland. Well, he’s gotten another lucky break!


Mr. Obama won Wood County in Ohio this year. That’s right, Mr. Obama won the majority of Wood County’s 108% of registered voters. That’s not a typo.

In 2012, 106,258 people in Wood County are registered to vote out of an eligible 98,213.

Secretary of College Democrats Morgan Holliger chimed in, “We won Wood County, we won Ohio.”

Mr. Obama did indeed win Wood County, along with its 108% of voters.

Half the Democratic ground game is voter turnout. The other half is voter fraud. Voter ID would make an impact on this game, but that would be just like the return of Segregation or something.

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenf...n-ohio-county/

[budfox]

Yep, they don't even try to hide it anymore and if you say something to your fluoride head neighbor they just shake their head, mumble something and walk away.

[DodgebyDave]

this whole deal has been a fraud since (insert year of surprise buttsecks here).

[birddog]

I'm just waiting for one state to tell theFederal Government to F-off. Then we can all move there....

[GOLD DUCK]

QWAK,Goldhedge ,The realy bad part is that all 108% of them voters get checks and food stamps and asorted other benifits!

How many ZOMBIES also got GHOST GREEN JOBS -- we will never know.

the DUCK

[searcher]

Vote was astronomical for Obama in some Philadelphia wards


November 09, 2012|By Miriam Hill, Jonathan Lai, and Andrew Seidman, Inquirer Staff Writers



Some Philadelphia neighborhoods outdid themselves in Tuesday's presidential election.
In a city where President Obama received more than 85 percent of the votes, in some places he received almost every one. In 13 Philadelphia wards, Obama received 99 percent of the vote or more.
Those wards, many with large African American populations, also swung heavily for Obama over John McCain in 2008. But the difficult economy seemed destined to dampen that enthusiasm four years later.
Not to worry. Ward leaders and voters said they were just as motivated this time.
"In this election, you had to point out to the people what was at stake. And in many cases, they felt that the Romney doctrine was not going to favor the working man," said Edgar "Sonny" Campbell.
Story continues below.




Campbell is leader of West Philadelphia's Fourth Ward, where Obama received 9,955 votes. Romney? Just 55. That's five fewer than McCain in 2008.
Campbell acknowledged that the odds are stacked in his favor in Philadelphia, where Democrats outnumber GOP voters by nearly 7-1.
"You are looking at black neighborhoods where you have 1,000 voters in a division and maybe seven Republicans," he said. "We are shocked if Romney got any votes."
Even so, Randall Miller, a history professor at St. Joseph's University, said politicians almost never get 99 percent of the votes anywhere except, perhaps, the towns where they were born.
He said the Democratic voter turnout effort deserved credit for the president's success.
"Ninety-nine percent is extraordinary, and it shows discipline as much as anything else," he said.
Philadelphia's numbers were tilted so far in favor of Obama that one incredulous Republican revived the specter of voter fraud.
House Speaker Sam Smith, musing over "staggering" turnout in some city precincts and reacting to wrong information that "90 percent of the precincts in Philadelphia County turned out over 90 percent of voters," called the ability to get such numbers "questionable."
Smith's math does not add up. Voter turnout in Philadelphia was around 60 percent, according to state election figures.
State Sen. Vincent Hughes (D. Phila.) responded swiftly. He said Philadelphians came out to vote because they were tired of the "hard-right" Republican agenda.
"If they believe there was a corruption of the process, then go to court and challenge it. Show the people of Pennsylvania," Hughes said. "Beyond that, shut up."

Link: Vote was astronomical for Obama in some Philadelphia wards


www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/presidential/20121108_Vote_was...
Nov 08, 2012 · In a city where President Obama received more than 85 percent of the votes, in some places he received almost every one. In 13 Philadelphia wards, Obama ...

[gnome]

Is that a lot?

[Alric]

According to the Wood county's website, and the state website(and both match each other). Obama got 31596, and Romney got 28997 in wood county. Also there are 108014 registered voters, so half of the people registered didn't even vote.

The only funny business going on here, is the person who wrote this article trying to manipulate numbers to get people all upset when nothing actually happened.

[gnome]

According to the Wood county's website, and the state website(and both match each other). Obama got 31596, and Romney got 28997 in wood county. Also there are 108014 registered voters, so half of the people registered didn't even vote.

The only funny business going on here, is the person who wrote this article trying to manipulate numbers to get people all upset when nothing actually happened.

On second look, yeah it appears that way.

The 108% is based on last year's census numbers. And we know the census is, like, accurate.

[MKS]

He sure was popular in Ohio.

What Luck! Obama Won Dozens of Cleveland Districts with 100% of the Vote
Posted by Aurelius at 8:56 PM

President Obama must have run a great campaign considering the tremendous numbers he put up in numerous big cities. Over in Philadelphia, he was lucky enough to get 90% percent turnout in some districts with over 99% of the vote.

In Cleveland, in some districts he did even better with an astounding 100% of the vote in dozens of locations. For example, in Cleveland's Fifth Ward, Mr. Obama won districts E, F, and G 1,337 to Mitt Romney's... 0. And in case you're wondering, Gary Johnson received more votes than Mr. Romney.

Well, maybe that's just a fluke. In the Ninth Ward, Mr. Obama won districts D-G with a paltry total of 1,740 to... 3. Hey, at least Romney got .2% of the vote!
1,337-0
Okay, what if we look at an entire Ward? No way this trend continues, right? An entire ward. Why not do the First Ward? Obama won that one 12,857 to... 94. This time Romney got .7% of the vote. He's moving up in the world!

In total, there are 21 districts in Cleveland where Mr. Romney received precisely 0 votes. In 23 districts, he received precisely 1 vote. And naturally, in one of the districts where Obama won 100% of the vote, there was 100% turnout. What a coincidence!

By the way, in case you are thinking that Romney did so poorly because maybe those districts were not very populated: Nope. In those 44 districts, Mr. Obama won 14,686 to 23. That's .16% of the vote for Romney.

But Ohio's not important in the electoral college, right?

Update: Mr. Obama won in St. Lucie County, Florida, which had over 140% voter turnout.

http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/w....html?spref=tw

[cpthnsolo]

I've been watching CNN around the clock waiting for them to discuss some of these irregularities. After all they sure as he77 were focused on them for weeks after the 2000 election. Why wouldn't they care this time

[andial]

Doesn't seem like Romney or Ryan are interested in the irregularities.

[oldgaranddad]

What we really need is a total re-registration process for all voters in every precinct, ward, district, etc. using biometric identification such a thumb prints or something similar. We should also do here what we do in other countries and dip the voters finger in some type of permanant ink once they cast their vote.

Wait? What am I saying? The Democrats (and in some minute parts of the country, Republicans) would never allow such a thing!

[oldgaranddad]

Doesn't seem like Romney or Ryan are interested in the irregularities.

They know taking this to Democratically leaning courts would be like Don Quixote jousting windmills, why bother?

[Ebie]

Vote fraud is not needed when media control is effective.
I suspect Stalin could have received over 50% of the vote using media control and intimidation.
Vote fraud is one of the last steps of a process.

[samwiii]

"In this election, you had to point out to the people what was at stake. And in many cases, they felt that the Romney doctrine was not going to favor the working man," said Edgar.

Now THAT'S funny right there. The real fear was that they would have to become working men.

[Alric]

Doesn't seem like Romney or Ryan are interested in the irregularities.

They might, you know if these irregularities actually existed and weren't just manipulation of data to make them appear to have happened. I am kind of tired of these these fake rigged elections articles. Stealing votes is a serious matter, and we need to be out tracking down the real violations, which there seems to be every election. However, a lot of them are just fake articles from people who like to stir up trouble, and all they do is distract people from the real problems.

[phideaux]

Doesn't seem like Romney or Ryan are interested in the irregularities.

Not to mention the "irregularities" in Obomba entire life story.

Forged birth certificate
Forged Selective Service registration
Forged Social Security registration
And on and on...

[andial]

They know taking this to Democratically leaning courts would be like Don Quixote jousting windmills, why bother?

Why bother? I thought Romney said the country's fate rested on this election. One would think Romney would be making a stink since the election was so important, is he just going to fade away now? Of course the story might not be true also as Alric stated.

[Gcubed]

Not to mention the "irregularities" in Obomba entire life story.

Forged birth certificate
Forged Selective Service registration
Forged Social Security registration
And on and on...

Fido, Like it or not (I DON'T) the guy was re-elected. I understand and sympathize with your position. That said, aint it time to give it a rest? WE ALL KNOW!! OK??

[Triunfar]

Doesn't seem like Romney or Ryan are interested in the irregularities.

Romney is probably on the docket for a Nobel Prize. Let's see, Gore was global warming, I guess Romney could get a prize in economics, you know, the Bain Capital achievements in advancing wealth.

[orovicino]

Fido, Like it or not (I DON'T) the guy was re-elected. I understand and sympathize with your position. That said, aint it time to give it a rest? WE ALL KNOW!! OK??

like it or not. rummy tried to buy the election with mail,tv adds, signs, and lies. a completely hands off aproach,while obam energized the electorate to go door to door, eyeball to eyeball,belly to belly with the people, something republicans would think is way way benieth them...

[gnome]

They might, you know if these irregularities actually existed and weren't just manipulation of data to make them appear to have happened. I am kind of tired of these these fake rigged elections articles. Stealing votes is a serious matter, and we need to be out tracking down the real violations, which there seems to be every election. However, a lot of them are just fake articles from people who like to stir up trouble, and all they do is distract people from the real problems.

The boy who cried wolf is alive and well on the internet, and he lacks critical thinking skills.

At some point the hysterical false alarms do end up numbing us to the real horrors going on. I'm not saying that there is nothing to these stories from Ohio or Port St. Lousy. But at first and second glance they look pretty weak, and not worth the time of digging deeper.

[Alric]

Well right here on this forum there are people who say they will never vote because they think every election in every state is totally controlled. They probably read to many articles like these and given up hope. Which is a shame, since all those people who have given up could be voting for actual change.

[Garyw]

I'm just waiting for one state to tell theFederal Government to F-off. Then we can all move there....

Here is our chance.
http://www.dailypaul.com/262715/15-s...de-from-the-us

[GOLD DUCK]

Well right here on this forum there are people who say they will never vote because they think every election in every state is totally controlled. They probably read to many articles like these and given up hope. Which is a shame, since all those people who have given up could be voting for actual change.

QWAK,Alric,Change in to WHAT you got your CHANGE things got WORSE and now you will get lots more!

Six of ONE half a dozen of the other the only choice you got is who gets to ROB you!

I voted with my feet got as far away as I could did with out as much as I posably could and SAVED and converted my small savings to PMs --- it is that VOTE that COUNTS --- not some SILLY election!

the DUCK