Gold Is Money -- Gold is Money -  The Premier Gold and Silver Forum -- Goldismoney Gold Is Money -- Gold is Money -  The Premier Gold and Silver Forum -- Goldismoney
Welcome Guest, is this your first visit?
Register today to gain access to all of our features which include creating topics, replying back to posts, private messaging and much more!

What are you waiting for?
Already Joined?
Sign into your account now
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Staatssicherheitsdienst: Schild und Schwert der Partei

  1. Post #1

    Silver Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Thanked 247 Times in 170 Posts

    Default Staatssicherheitsdienst: Schild und Schwert der Partei

    For the history buffs.

    Living with the Enemy: Informing the Stasi in the GDR.

    By David Cook

    The German Democratic Republic (GDR) was the golden child of the Soviet Union, often portrayed as the torch bearer for the communist system around the world. Yet its people still could not be allowed the freedom to air their individual opinions, the views of the state were final and absolute, and to contradict the party was considered no less serious a crime than treason itself. A powerful police organ was needed to keep the people in check, a progenitor of fear that would bend the populace to the will of the state. In the GDR the Ministerium für Staatssicherheit (MfS), commonly known as the Stasi, was the tool used to attempt to mould the East German people to the Communist Party’s (SED) requirements. However, police and party pressure alone is not enough to oppress an entire country; popular participation is ultimately key to any regime’s survival. In the case of the GDR, its own people helped to maintain the party’s power through their role as police informers. Informers played a crucial role, acting as a vital cog in the vast machinery of the East German police state; both responding to and perpetuating the climate of fear that permeated throughout East German society.

    By 1989, when the Berlin Wall collapsed and communism in East Germany came to an end, it is estimated that the MfS had 97,000 official employees as well as approximately 173,000 unofficial informers. Roughly this translated as a ratio of one agent per 63 of the population, a position far in advance of the Soviet Union’s KGB, that even at its height could only manage one per 5830 people (Figures taken from Anna Funder, Stasiland, Granta: 2004). The Stasi amounted to a small army infiltrating the very fabric of the communist regime, whose sole purpose was the surveillance and repression of the East German people. Fear of the state – and of the Stasi as a tool of state control – was widespread, and this terror was used as a vital tool in the creation of a malleable citizenry.

    There were a variety of things that could bring a person to the attention of the Stasi. Once the MfS had targeted a suspect the goal was often to engender self-doubt in that person, to prevent them from living any semblance of a normal life, and if indeed they were guilty of some form of ‘subversion’, to encourage them to further implicate and discredit themselves. Ulrike Poppe was one such individual whose work in dissident peace and feminist movements were deemed to be a threat to the stability of communist East Germany by the Stasi. Between 1973 – 1989, Poppe was arrested a total of 14 times. For 15 years she was placed under surveillance, followed by her own personal MfS agent and subjected to daily harassment. In this way the Stasi undermined their targets’ self-confidence and peace of mind, rather than physically beating them. Although physical coercion was employed by the Stasi, the evidence indicates that they often preferred to utilise more ‘subtle’ (but equally effective) means of psychological torture. Isolation, sleep deprivation, disorientation, humiliation, restriction of food and water and ominous threats against the subject and their families combined with promises of leniency if they ‘confessed’ were all commonly cited interrogation tactics. The MfS was not concerned with human rights and paid no more than lip service to the notion of a democratic legal process and legitimate trials, as illustrated by the head of the Stasi, Erich Mielke, who maintained a policy of: ‘Execution, if necessary without a court verdict.’

    For the police state to function fully however, participation from amongst the populace was key. Their vital tool here was to be the Inofizelle Mitarbeiter (I.M). IMs were unofficial collaborators who informed on work colleagues, friends, and even their own spouses. Informers were a part of everyday life, supplying the Stasi with the banal trivialities that they deemed necessary to neutralise their targets. During the lifespan of the communist regime in East Germany it is estimated from existing archival material that there were up to 500,000 informers active at various times. Or more starkly one in 30 of the population had worked for the Stasi by the fall of the GDR. Informers were controlled by their own special department, HA IX (Main Department 9), often referred to as ‘the centre of the inquisition.’

    People were not often willing informers however, and it would be wrong to accuse the majority of East Germans of freely consenting to work with the Stasi. Motives for becoming an informer appear to be numerous, and this topic has provided the basis for many historical works. Yet as crucial as they were to the oppression of the population, what drove so many East Germans to inform on their own people? Robert Gellately in his article, Denunciation in 20th Century Germany, posits a view of a ‘culture of denunciation’ that was a hangover from the Nazi period. People became I.Ms for a number of reasons in his view: for personal gain; so visits to the West would be granted; from a desire to change the system from within; or in the majority of cases through blackmail and coercion by the Stasi. Fear then, was also used as a tool to recruit informers from the general populace.

    Timothy Garton Ash’s book, The File, is based on his own personal Stasi file as he tracks down and talks to many of those that informed on him, noting the motivations behind their actions. Each of the informers exhibits differing reasons for their collaboration, all of which are covered by Gellately’s theory. ‘Michaela’ was an art director and as such was encouraged to inform on those the Stasi deemed interesting in order to make her job easier. Visas enabling visits to art exhibits in the West or much needed budget increases could be obtained in exchange for information. Whilst ‘Michalea’ was an example of someone working for the police state for personal gain, two other examples in Garton Ash’s book were recruited through blackmail. ‘Schuldt’ was persuaded to become an informer due to fear of his homosexuality being made public and his life ruined; ‘Smith’ on the other hand collaborated to prove his innocence in the face of accusations of being a Western spy. In this way the Stasi was able to build up a frighteningly vast network of informers utilised to collate data on anyone deemed of interest to the state.

    Fear, as illustrated in the cases of ‘Smith’ and ‘Schuldt’, was the most powerful weapon possessed by the Stasi. It was a weapon they utilised freely, creating large networks of informers and ensuring the system survived. The MfS were the source of this fear in society at large, creating a resigned conformity amongst the masses that kept them subordinate to the whims of the SED. This is the crucial role played by the security apparatus in a truly repressive police state. Without the conformity of the lower levels of society the system would have collapsed. The majority of the population learned, from a dread of the consequences, to live with this authority in return for living a semblance of a peaceful life. Reicker, Schwarz and Schneider describe the day to day life of a GDR citizen as such: ‘The daily lie, which everyone participated in to some extent … Once you learn to accept the big political lie you allow yourself little lies in other places. Unconsciously.’ It was this willingness by the German population to be subjected to authority, and the all powerful nature of the MfS, that Funder argues led to the relatively low level dissident movement within the GDR.

    Everyday life was pervaded by the party ideology, the individual was disregarded and the regime elevated above it. Virtually no corner of life was left untouched by the influence of the party and its ‘guard dog’, the Stasi. The security apparatus infiltrated and manipulated the educational sector; determining who could study at university and which subjects were ‘suitable’ for academic research and teaching, with almost a quarter of staff at the East German Humboldt university in the Stasi’s employ. All communication in and out of the communist state was monitored and intercepted by the MfS. In East Berlin, 25 phone stations enabled the tapping of up to 20,000 calls simultaneously. Figures show that 2,300 telegrams a day were read by the Stasi in 1983 alone. Interception of packages also proved to be a favoured method of state security, and one that provided rich dividends. Estimates taken from surviving archival material put the figure of currency seized by the MfS as equalling 32.8 million DM. (Figures taken from Mike Dennis, The Stasi: Myth and Reality, Longman: 2003)

    Life was controlled by the MfS and the SED, with all methods utilised to prevent contact with the western world. People adapt however, and East Germans developed ‘coping mechanisms’. Secret codes and gestures were developed to indicate when known Stasi informers or operatives were nearby. Even today the terror of the MfS remains a powerful force in the everyday life of former GDR citizens, acting as a kind of ‘wall in the mind’. Claudia Rusch, the daughter of an East German dissident, leaves no doubt as to the GDR’s status as a police state in her description of life under the former regime:

    “That was the real strength of the state security; to produce the effect that millions of people behaved towards one another with anxiety, self-control and suspicion. They ensured that if you told a political joke you automatically lowered your voice. Anticipatory obedience spread through every sinew of society and intimidated a whole nation”.

    (Claudia Rusch, quoted in Mary Fulbrook, The People’s State, Yale University Press: 2005)

    The people of East Germany were browbeaten by the Stasi’s propagation of fear, its far reaching tentacles spread through society in the form of informers hidden in plain sight. Any person deemed of particular interest had an MfS file which would contain an almost minute-by-minute account of the suspect’s life, from which the MfS could create any motive for action they deemed necessary. Fear pervaded all aspects of life in the GDR, the population cowed by the threat of MfS reprisal, unable to build the foundations for an opposition movement. In the pursuit of blanket surveillance of the population, the Stasi gained a terrifying level of power over the East German people and could manipulate them at their whim. Agents of the state were everywhere, in the workplace, the classroom and even sleeping in the same bed. In this way conformity was enforced through implicit, rather than explicit terror.

    About the Author:

    David Cook has just completed his BA (Hons) in History at Swansea University, graduating with first-class honours in July 2011. During the final year of his study he specialised in the study of Cold War Eastern Europe. Following university David plans to travel, before eventually undertaking a Masters degree in History.

    For more information on this topic see:

    Timothy Garton Ash, The File: A Personal History, (London: Atlantic Books, 2009)

    Mary Fulbrook, Anatomy of a Dictatorship: Inside the GDR 1949-1989, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)

    Mary Fulbrook, The People’s State: East German Society from Hitler to Hoenecker, (London:YaleUniversity Press, 2005)

    Anna Funder, Stasiland: Stories From Behind the Berlin Wall, (London: Granta Books, 2004)

    Robert Gellately, Denunciations in 20th Century Germany: Aspects of Self-Policing in the Third Reich and the German Democratic Republic

    Here >>>

  2. Post #2

    GIM Statesman searcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    the city
    Thanked 17,856 Times in 8,120 Posts

    Default Re: Staatssicherheitsdienst: Schild und Schwert der Partei

    We're heading to the place described above. TSA, DHS.............See Something - Say Something.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to searcher For This Useful Post:

    hoarder (11-24-2012)

  4. Post #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Nova Albion
    Thanked 37 Times in 26 Posts

    Default Re: Staatssicherheitsdienst: Schild und Schwert der Partei

    Quote Originally Posted by searcher View Post
    We're heading to the place described above. TSA, DHS.............See Something - Say Something.
    We've been there for a long, long time.

  5. Post #4

    Gold Member Kaiser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Monaco di Baviera
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 492 Posts

    Default Re: Staatssicherheitsdienst: Schild und Schwert der Partei

    and he was the head of the Stasi

    GDR citizen getting very angry with the police...

    Remember the heroes of 09.09.09

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Kaiser For This Useful Post:

    gringott (11-24-2012)

  7. Post #5

    Midas Member gringott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    You can't get there from here.
    Thanked 4,627 Times in 2,301 Posts

    Default Re: Staatssicherheitsdienst: Schild und Schwert der Partei

    I will never forget the difference in the very atmosphere crossing over from West to East in Berlin. Very depressing. Sunny to gray or so it seemed.

    Once we decided to do something odd, we went to a "workingman's" type bar instead of the typical place for visitors. We were not there more than about 15 minutes before the ordinary workers [customers] started to be replaced by border guards, within 30 minutes all the civilian customers were replaced. We decided nothing good was going to happen, so we eased our way out and never pulled that one again.

  8. Post #6

    Gold Member Kaiser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Monaco di Baviera
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 492 Posts

    Default Re: Staatssicherheitsdienst: Schild und Schwert der Partei

    The Party is always right...
    Song of the party

    Sie hat uns alles gegeben,

    Sonne und Wind und sie geizte nie.

    Wo sie war, war das Leben,

    Was wir sind, sind wir durch sie.

    Sie hat uns niemals verlassen,

    Fror auch die Welt, uns war warm.

    Uns schuetzt die Mutter der Massen,

    Uns traegt ihr maechtiger Arm.

    Die Partei, die Partei,

    Sie hat immer recht

    Und Genossen es bleibe dabei,

    Wer da kaempft fuer das Recht,

    Der hat immer recht

    Gegen Luege und Ausbeuterei.

    Wer das Leben beleidigt,

    Ist dumm oder schlecht,

    Wer die Menschen verteidigt,

    Hat immer recht.

    So aus Lenin schem Geist

    Wird von Stalin geschweisst

    Die Partei, die Partei, die Partei. Sie hat uns niemals geschmeichelt.

    Sank uns im Kampfe auch manchmal der Mut,

    Hat sie uns leis nur gestreichelt:

    "Zagt nicht!" und gleich war uns gut.

    Zaehlt denn noch Schmerz und Beschwerde,

    Wenn uns das Gute gelingt,

    Wenn man den Aermsten der Erde,

    Freiheit und Frieden erzwingt?

    Die Partei, die Partei . . . .

    Sie hat uns alles gegeben,

    Ziegel zum Bau und den grossen Plan.

    Sie sprach: "Meistert das Leben,

    Vorwaerts Genossen, packt an."

    Hetzen Hyaenen zum Kriege,

    Bricht euer Bau ihre Macht.

    Zimmert das Haus und die Wiege,

    Bauleute, seid auf der Wacht!
    Remember the heroes of 09.09.09

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

The Quotes are powered by