1. Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
    Dismiss Notice
  2. There are no markets
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Week of 6/24/2017 Closing prices & Chg Over Last Wk---- Gold $1256.40 Silver $16.64 Oil $43.01 USD $96.94
  4. "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"
    Dismiss Notice

Nuclear Powered Planes, Trains And Automobiles

Discussion in 'Auto, Tractor, Motorcycles, Racing, and Mechanics' started by searcher, Apr 14, 2017.



  1. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    117,968
    Likes Received:
    35,954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nuclear powered Planes, Trains and Automobiles
    Curious Droid



    Published on Apr 9, 2017
    To quote L.P Hartleys 1953 book “The GoBetween”, “The past is a different country, they do things differently there”.
    That’s definitely something that could be applied our attitude to the newly discovered atomic power in the late 1940’s and 50s.
    Within just a few years after the first atomic bombs had been dropped on Japan, it seemed as though the atom would the cure all our all our energy needs with power “too cheap to meter” as was once quoted.
    Whilst ships and submarines of the leading navies went nuclear, companies put forward ideas for atomic powered planes, trains and yes, indeed automobiles.
    The first idea of using a radioactive power source for a car, in this case, Radium, dates back to 1903 and in 1937 further analysis of the concept thought that it would need 50 tonnes of shielding to protect the driver. But with the development of the small self-contained reactors for ships and submarines in the 1950’s, the idea of atomic cars was back on the table.
    In 1958 Ford unveiled a Uranium powered concept car called, with a typically 1950’s futuristic name, the Ford Nucleon. In essence, it was a scaled down submarine reactor in the back of the car which would heat stored water into high-pressure stream which then drove two turbines, one which provided the power to the wheels and the other which drove an electrical generator.
    Ford engineers anticipated that it would have a range of about 5000 miles before you would need to nip into your local Ford dealers for the uranium core to be swapped out for a new one.
    The passenger compartment was situated over the front wheels allowing the bulk of the reactor and the heavy shielding to be more centrally placed and to keep you as far as possible from the reactor.
    As was the optimism of the 1950’s and the naivety of the general public, it was believed that nuclear power would eventually replace petrol power in the future.
    Something which doesn’t bear thinking about if imagine that a car crash could turn into a major nuclear incident.
    Ford only ever made scale models of the Nucleon as they anticipated the miniaturisation of the reactors and lighter shielding materials. As these didn’t appear and with the public’s increased awareness of radiation and nuclear waste, the project was dropped and the models ended up in the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, Michigan.
    Now if you thought that the Ford Nucleon was a bit far fetched just look at the French Simca Fulga, a 1958 concept car designed by Robert Opron. This was meant to show how cars might look in the year 2000, powered by a nuclear reactor with voice control and guided by radar and an autopilot which communicated with a control tower. At over speeds of 150 km/h two of the wheels would retract and it would balance on the remaining two with the aid of gyroscopes.
    Also in France in 1957-58, the Arbel-Symétric was proposed with either a gas generator or 40Kw nuclear reactor called the “Genestatom”. This would use radioactive cartridges made from nuclear waste. However, the French government disapproved of the use of nuclear fuel in cars and the development stopped.
    Of all the land-based forms of transport, Trains were the most likely candidates to be nuclear powered, especially those travelling across large areas where electrification had not been done.
    In the US, a nuclear-powered locomotive called the X-12 was put forward in a design study for the Association of American Railroads and several other companies by Dr Lyle Borst, one of the early members of the Manhattan project, which created the first Atomic bomb.
    The X-12 would use liquid Uranium 235 oxide dissolved in sulfuric acid in a 3ft by 1ft container, surrounded by 200 tonnes of shielding. The reactor would then create the steam to power the turbines to drive four electrical generators.
    These would create the 7000hp of electricity to power the motors. This was the same as a four loco unit each having 1750hp but would only need to the refuelled once a year, although it would have cost about twice the price of a four loco unit.
    The whole locomotive would be 160 ft long and weigh 360 tonnes and would have an articulated rear section where all the cooling radiators would be placed.
    But the cost of developing such locomotive without government subsidies and the highly enriched uranium 235 together with the huge cost of liability insurance in case of an accident made the X-12 uneconomic and it was not pursued by any of the train companies.
    However, in 1950’s Soviet Russia, money was not the issue as it was in the US. In places like the north, Far east and central Asian deserts it was thought that electrification of newly built railway lines was not advisable at the time.

    Title: Adam Are You Free?
    Author: P C III
    Source: www.pipechoir.com
    Nightingale sounds from Gerry Gutteridge flic.kr/ps/Mk2zU
    License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
     

Share This Page