• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

Banksters still ripping us off!

Uglytruth

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
7,032
Likes
10,947
#1
A lot more at the link.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019...lating-precious-metals-market-thousands-times

Merrill Lynch Caught Criminally Manipulating Precious Metals Market "Thousands Of Times" Over 6 Years



by Tyler Durden

Wed, 06/26/2019 - 07:35

0

SHARES

Twitter Facebook Reddit Email
Print


Remember when it was pure tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory to accuse one or more banks of aggressively, compulsively and systematically manipulating the precious metals - i.e., gold and silver - market? We do, after all we made the claim over and over, while demonstrating clearly just how said manipulation was taking place, often in real time.
Well, it's always good to be proven correct, even if it is years after the fact.
On Tuesday after the close, the CFTC announced that Merrill Lynch Commodities (MLCI), a global commodities trading business, agreed to pay $25 million to resolve the government’s investigation into a multi-year scheme by MLCI precious metals traders to mislead the market for precious metals futures contracts traded on the COMEX (Commodity Exchange Inc.). The announcement was made by Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and Assistant Director in Charge William F. Sweeney Jr. of the FBI’s New York Field Office. In other words, if the Merrill Lynch Commodities group was an individual, he would have gotten ye olde perp walk.
As MLCI itself admitted, beginning in 2008 and continuing through 2014, precious metals traders employed by MLCI schemed to deceive other market participants by injecting materially false and misleading information into the precious metals futures market.

They did so in the now traditional market manipulation way - by placing fraudulent orders for precious metals futures contracts that, at the time the traders placed the orders, they intended to cancel before execution. In doing so, the traders intended to “spoof” or manipulate the market by creating the false impression of increased supply or demand and, in turn, to fraudulently induce other market participants to buy and to sell futures contracts at quantities, prices and times that they otherwise likely would not have done so. Over the relevant period, the traders placed thousands of fraudulent orders.
Of course, since we are talking about a bank, and since banks are in charge of not only the DOJ, and virtually every other branch of government, not to mention the Fed, nobody will go to jail and MLCI entered into a non-prosecution agreement and agreed to pay a combined - and measly - $25 million in criminal fines, restitution and forfeiture of trading profits.
Under the terms of the NPA, MLCI and its parent company, Bank of America, have agreed to cooperate with the government’s ongoing investigation of individuals and to report to the Department evidence or allegations of violations of the wire fraud statute, securities and commodities fraud statute, and anti-spoofing provision of the Commodity Exchange Act in BAC’s Global Markets’ Commodities Business, whose function is to conduct wholesale, principal trading and sales of commodities. Laughably, MLCI and BAC also agreed to enhance their existing compliance program and internal controls, where necessary and appropriate, to ensure they are designed to detect and deter, among other things, manipulative conduct in BAC’s Global Markets Commodities Business.
Translation: it will be much more difficult to catch them manipulating the market next time.
The Department reached this resolution based on a number of factors, including MLCI’s ongoing cooperation with the United States - which means the DOJ must have had the bank dead to rights with many traders potentially ending up in jail - and MLCI and BAC’s remedial efforts, including conducting training concerning appropriate market conduct and implementing improved transaction monitoring and communication surveillance systems and processes. Translation - no longer boasting about market manipulation on semi-public chatboards.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission also announced a separate settlement with MLCI today in connection with related, parallel proceedings. Under the terms of the resolution with the CFTC, MLCI agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $11.5 million, along with other remedial and cooperation obligations in connection with any CFTC investigation pertaining to the underlying conduct.
As part of the investigation, the Department obtained an indictment against Edward Bases and John Pacilio, two former MLCI precious metals traders, in July 2018. Those charges remain pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
This case was investigated by the FBI’s New York Field Office. Trial Attorneys Ankush Khardori and Avi Perry of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section prosecuted the case. The CFTC also provided assistance in this matter.
Oh, and for anyone asking if they will get some of their money back for having been spoofed and manipulated by Bank of America, and countless other banks, into selling to buying positions that would have eventually made money, the answer is of course not.




U.S. Department of Justice
Criminal Division
Fraud Section

Washington, D.C. 20005
June 25, 2019 Reginald J. Brown, Esq. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20006 Re: Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. Criminal Investigation Dear Mr. Brown: The United States Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section (the “Fraud Section”), and Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. (“MLCI”), pursuant to authority granted by MLCI’s Board of Directors, enters into this Non-Prosecution Agreement (“Agreement”). As indicated below, MLCI’s ultimate parent (“MLCI Parent”), pursuant to authority granted by MLCI Parent’s Board of Directors, is also undertaking certain obligations under this Agreement. 1. The Fraud Section enters into this Agreement based on the individual facts and circumstances presented by this case, including those described below: (a) MLCI did not receive voluntary disclosure credit because it did not voluntarily and timely disclose to the Fraud Section the conduct described in the Statement of Facts attached hereto as Attachment A (“Statement of Facts”); (b) MLCI received credit for its cooperation with the Fraud Section’s investigation, including collecting, analyzing, and organizing voluminous evidence and information for the Fraud Section; (c) by the conclusion of the investigation, MLCI provided to the Fraud Section all relevant facts known to it, including information about the individuals involved in the conduct described in the attached Statement of Facts and conduct disclosed to the Fraud Section prior to the Agreement; (d) MLCI and MLCI Parent engaged in remedial measures prior to the commencement of the Fraud Section’s investigation of the conduct set forth in the attached Statement of Facts (Attachment A) and thereafter, including enhancing their compliance program and internal controls designed to detect and deter spoofing and other manipulative conduct through, among other things, (i) enhanced policies and procedures relating to ethical behavior, prohibited conduct, and escalation of potential misconduct; (ii) updated routine and ongoing training concerning appropriate market conduct; (iii) improved transaction monitoring and communication
 

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
34,095
Likes
45,555
#2
$25M fine, slap on the wrist.

Isn't there a thread here about this topic already?
 

Cigarlover

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
6,292
Likes
11,794
#3
yep, bankers fuck us out of our money/profits. Gov takes them to court on our behalf and keeps all the settlement money. Under Obama all the settlement money went to left wing orgs.