• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

China’s Nuclear Option to Sell US Treasurys,

Scorpio

Hunter of Chin Li's Boo Hoo Flu
Founding Member
Board Elder
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
32,338
Likes
46,460
#1
China’s Nuclear Option to Sell US Treasurys, Report 19 May
May 20, 2019/3 Comments/by Keith Weiner


There is a drumbeat pounding on a monetary issue, which is now rising into a crescendo. The issue is: China might sell its holdings of Treasury bonds—well over $1 trillion—and crash the Treasury bond market. Since the interest rate is inverse to the bond price, a crash of the price would be a skyrocket of the rate. The US government would face spiraling costs of servicing its debt, and quickly collapse into bankruptcy. America could follow the path taken by Venezuela or Zimbabwe.
How serious is this threat?
The Independent Institute wrote (replete with a graphic purportedly showing a “nuclear bomb”) about it:
What would happen if the Chinese government were to weaponize its holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds by suddenly selling off all of them?
That’s an option that has been suggested by Hu Xijin, the editor of the government-controlled Global Times.
Dumping its U.S. national debt holdings is considered to be China’s “nuclear option” for retaliating against the U.S. government in the trade war…
The Financial Time headline says it all: “China dumps US Treasuries at fastest pace in two years”. The body of the article uses that word “weaponise” (British spelling).
Bloomberg warns that, “Trade Feud Has Treasury Investors Eyeing China’s Holdings at Fed”. At least their article does not reiterate “weaponized”.
CNBC adds a new element, that in killing America, China would be destroying itself too. The article uses the word “weapon”, as well as calling it the “nuclear option.”
Capital Outflows
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard at the Telegraph is one of the few voices looking at the “accelerating pace of capital outflows from China”. He provides lots of good analysis that we would say is common sense, except it is presently uncommon (yes, yes, we know that common, here, refers to base logic not ubiquity). Capital outflows are due to foreign investors fearing the impact to Chinese corporate profitability from Trump’s tariffs, and Chinese corporations raising US dollars to avert potential defaults.
All around the world, businesses borrow US dollars. They must somehow earn dollar revenue to service this debt. A trade war reduces the volume of trade, and can crush the profitability of the trade that survives. Therefore it makes dollar debtors more desperate for dollars.
To Evans-Pritchard’s list, we would add one more driver. From many informal conversations we have had, we see a picture of high net individuals seeking to move capital out of the yuan. This outflow, by the way, risks rupturing Hong Kong’s currency peg, managed by its currency board (one of the darling ideas of monetary central planning).
Today, we want to cover the point that China can’t sell Treasurys, because it would hurt itself. China would suffer some pretty severe powder burns if it were to fire this weapon. And next week, we will prove our main point: although China might affect the price of USD against whatever other currency it might buy, it cannot affect the interest rate.
Self-Inflicted Wounds
Selling of the USD is simply China taking the other side of the trade, of those who are selling yuan to buy dollars. China does not want the yuan to collapse, so when there is heavy selling pressure it steps up as the buyer. Which means selling its dollar reserves. The price of the yuan is under China’s control, so long as its dollar reserves hold out. If it runs out of dollars, then that is when the world will discover what the market value of the yuan really is. Its dollar holdings are a precious reserve that it needs to marshal carefully, not squander.
Lest the above be taken as vindication for Trump’s tariffs “at least they’re hurting China more than America,” let us be clear. We are damning the whole regime of irredeemable currency, with the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. To do so with maximum impact, we must describe the mechanics of the system accurately.
The Addicts’ Need for Dollar Injections
Every country in the world (except a few pariahs) needs a steady flow of newly-created dollars. They must have dollar revenues to service their debts. And, like everyone else, they are trapped by the feature, not bug, irredeemable currency. Debt cannot be extinguished, only serviced. Someone must borrow more—many someones—to keep the scheme going.
We see here, in this discussion of Chinese capital outflows, a little bit of the meaning of the reserve currency. It does not mean: oil is priced in dollars (though oil is priced in dollars). It does not mean that transactions are settled in dollars (though they are settled in dollars). It means that a great deal of borrowing is done in dollars.
The growing group of Chinese manufacturers that are getting caught in the trade war’s net still must service their debts. If they cannot, then they are in default and their lenders will seize their assets. And, it should be noted, the lenders want the monthly cash flow, not the defunct manufacturers’ assets, because they themselves borrowed in order to lend. They must service their debts, or else face their own liquidations.
Not only is the dollar on the liability side of every major balance sheet in the world. It is also on the asset side. Including most especially the People’s Bank of China (PBoC). Like other central banks, it issues the local currency as its liability. And it holds dollars as its asset. That is, it borrows in its local currency to fund its portfolio of dollar assets. This is why we say that the other currencies are all dollar-derivatives.
Inside its local currency, the same mechanics of irredeemable currency are in effect. Debts cannot be extinguished, so there must be a steady flow of new borrowing sufficient for even the marginal debtor to service its debts. It is counter to this absolute requirement, for the PBoC to buy yuan and sell dollars. For a central bank to buy its own currency and sell assets, is to affect a monetary contraction. That is anathema to any irredeemable currency scheme.
Out of Frying Pan, Into Fire
At this point, someone might say that China need not sell dollars and buy yuan. It could trade its dollars for another currency. Aside from the question of whether another currency could support the enormous flows that China would create, and the fact that the other currencies are all dollar derivatives, there is a problem. The game for any central bank is to earn a profit on the spread between its liabilities and its assets. Let us explain.
The Fed is in the relatively simple position of borrowing short to lend long, with both liabilities and assets in the same currency. The Fed relies on the interest rate differential between its borrowings in the overnight market, and its long-term assets. This is normally positive (though there is now an inversion).
To this duration mismatch, other central banks add currency mismatch. They care both about the interest rate differential, and the exchange rate. Ideally, for them, their local currency would decline. Everyone loves a falling liability, indeed this is the point of inflationism. However, they must temper their desire. Their domestic corporations borrow in dollars. A falling local currency—in which they earn their revenues—feels to them like a rising dollar. They service their debts in dollars, which means they eat up more and more of their revenues to service the debt.
The next biggest currency, after the US dollar, is the euro. The euro now has the obvious problem of negative interest rates. So China would be borrowing at a positive interest rate, to buy assets with a negative interest rate. That is, it would pay to finance a portfolio that it would pay to hold. One need not be an economist of the Austrian School, to understand that this is not sustainable.
Summary
In part I, we have enumerated quite a list of challenges to the so called “nuclear option”:
  1. Yuan holders are selling yuan to buy dollars, PBOC can’t squander its dollar reserves
  2. If it doesn’t buy another currency, it merely tightens monetary conditions in China
  3. If it does, it will drive up the price of whatever it buys, but crash it when it sells later
  4. It is still supporting the dollar, as the euro is (like the yuan) a dollar-derivative
  5. It would lose money by holding the positon, due to the interest rate in the euro
  6. It incurs severe exchange-rate risk (the euro is in a downtrend against the dollar)
  7. And the debt of Spain, Italy, and others is headed for a train-wreck
Part I is the setup. All countries are trapped in this mad system of irredeemable currencies with the dollar as the world’s reserve. It cannot be changed, other than by moving to the gold standard.
In Part II, we will show that China (or anyone including the mythological bond vigilante, unicorn, and dragon) cannot affect the dollar interest rate.
Supply and Demand Fundamentals
The price of gold nine bucks. Brace for it… the price of silver fell more in proportion, 37 cents. We now have a new high on the gold-silver ratio.
For many years, some in the silver community wrote that silver was being consumed. That it was coming out of hoards and into industrial production, never to return. They meant it as a scarcity argument for a higher price. But if it is true, it is an argument that silver is being demonetized. Perhaps it is due to the Great Moderations of the central banks, or at least that is what the Fed’s apologists would say. Perhaps Or it could be that digital forms of gold, and products like the Aurum (a Monetary Metals lessee), remove the reasons for a second monetary metal to exist. No doubt the crypto bugs would say that bitcoin is replacing the monetary metals, and silver will go out the door first.
We don’t agree.
We will look at the data, and see the growing scarcity of silver that correlates to its shrinking price. But here, we want to make a different point. One which the crypto bugs would do well to seek to understand (and the Fed apologists understand, which is why they fight all the harder for irredeemable money).
It is not only the right of every human being to take his money home, withdraw it from the system, and refuse to extend credit. Not only is this a moral right, but it serves an important economic function also. It provides a break on credit expansion, and a floor under the interest rate. A floor that the Swiss franc, euro, and yen are sorely lacking. The dollar lacks it too, though we have seen only decades of falling rates, not negative rates yet.
Whatever you may think of this theory, there is no way to stop people from hoarding the monetary metals. Governments can try force, but they are more successful in pushing the metals underground than in stealing very much of them.
Crypto does not satisfy the demand for taking metal home. And we mean, literally, home. To put in one’s cabinet or under the floor boards. Or bury in the backyard. The essential feature being: personal possession.
Crypto currency was designed without any awareness of this need. Digital gold does not address it either. It is a need served only by physical metal.
And for many people, gold is too expensive. The amount they can take home is either too small (think of a 1-gram bar of gold vs. 3 1-ounce silver coins). Or the bid-ask spread on such tiny gold units is too large. For these folks, silver fills a need that gold (or anything else) does not.
These folks work for wages.
Silver is the most hoardable metal, i.e. marketable in the small (gold is the most marketable in the large).
Will the wage earners give up this need, and cease hoarding silver? Maybe. But it will take more than a bit of a drop in the silver price to make us think it’s happening. Today is yet another opportunity to say: “look at spreads, not prices.”
Anyways, let’s look at the supply and demand picture of gold. But, first, here is the chart of the prices of gold and silver.

Next, this is a graph of the gold price measured in silver, otherwise known as the gold to silver ratio (see here for an explanation of bid and offer prices for the ratio). The ratio rose, to a new high over 88.

Here is the gold graph showing gold basis, cobasis and the price of the dollar in terms of gold price.

The scarcity (i.e. cobasis) rises with the rise in the dollar (i.e. inverse of the price of gold in dollars). This is the soon-to-expire June contract. However, this time the gold basis continuous, shows the same trend, if less dramatically.
The Monetary Metals Gold Fundamental Price barely moved, ending the week at $1,370.
Now let’s look at silver.

The same trend occurs in silver, though this contract is a bit farther out. Note the backwardation, a month and a half from First Notice Day.
The scarcity of silver (i.e. cobasis) increased, but not a lot. Especially not in light of the drop in price.
The Monetary Metals Silver Fundamental Price was down another quarter, to $15.34.

© 2019 Monetary Metals


https://monetary-metals.com/chinas-nuclear-option-to-sell-us-treasurys-report-19-may/
 

Zed

The Bullish Bear.
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
17,888
Likes
18,399
Location
Watching the Sideshow!
#2
They'd be shooting up their biggest single export market and in the process putting their own massive and technically insolvent credit market under enough stress to blow it sky high. They have 45T in debt of which 22T is nonperforming all on a basis of 2T in assets. The charade can only be maintained while its current account position stays positive. To willingly put that under pressure is certain trouble, big trouble. They will only sell if they are forced into a situation that warrants it. i.e. if the Don takes the whole thing too far and blows their credit market up. Then they may just liquidate everything to patch up the situation.

JMO but I fecking doubt it.
 
Last edited:

Cigarlover

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
8,699
Likes
17,537
#3
a trillion doesn't sound like much when Obama was running a trillion a year plus in deficits. It may be a minor kink in the wheel but certainly not catastrophic. I will admit however, that I am not an expert.
 

Strawboss

Apocaloptimist
Site Mgr
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,587
Likes
17,185
#4
If you look at how carefully Trump is applying the sanctions...first he talks about them, then he does a little bit...then when that isnt enough - he does 10% on 300B and talks about 25%...then he does the 25% but gives a waiver for 90 days, etc...

I think Trump is trying to do "enough" to show Xi he is serious and has the leverage - and at the same time - he is trying to keep in mind the fact that Xi will need to be able to save face in order for their to be a deal at some point - which is partly why I think he always says how much he likes and respects Xi...

The reality is that China doesnt have the leverage to stay in this fight. With the executive order that is shutting down China's high tech market - thats a pretty big punch in the gut to China. They are going to lose a lot of suppliers - some of which are mission critical in order for them to continue manufacture for any length of time. If Google's Android is ultimately pulled - China will be in a world of hurt - especially as time goes by.

What most people dont fully understand (including myself sometimes) is just how powerful the US is. We have a very deep and diverse economy - the world reserve currency - the worlds strongest military - 2 oceans to protect us, etc...those are very big advantages against any adversary.

China has a pretty fundamental choice to make in my opinion. They can either modify their economic system to better get along with the Western world - or they can forego doing business with the West and suffer through the domestic economic dislocations that will result.

China has only 2 cards to play in this game (excluding the nuclear option of attacking Taiwan)...banning rare earth exports and dumping their Treasuries...and I am very confident that the Treasury dumping would be strategically handled to cause but a ripple in the big scheme of things...and besides - if China no longer wishes to hold Treasuries - what pray tell will they invest their current account surpluses in? The US is the only game in town at that level. And of course China knows it.

I am still confident a deal will be made - and I am also confident that Trump will settle for less than he is demanding in order to allow Xi to save face. The quid pro quo for Trump will be Xi's blessing to make peace with North Korea...as I think that is an integral part of any deal.

The wild card in this is whether Xi will be able to handle the domestic spillover from all this. When factories start shuttering over there because new orders have been routed to Vietnam, South Korea, etc...how is Xi going to respond? Will there be civil unrest?
You have a couple hundred million young men over there that already are dealing with the reality of there not being enough girls to go around...and then you take their jobs away from them too? That could turn into a formidable problem for Xi to deal with.

In summary - I think Trump has the much stronger hand of the 2. And I know he knows that.

Closing thought...some people say that the US would be hurt if Chinese junk quit hitting our shores...I would argue that when you consider how many garages and storage units around this country are jam packed with useless shit that Americans have bought and hardly ever used over the years...we have enough stuff to go around for the next 10 years...without needing what China can offer.
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
52,573
Likes
98,890
Location
Rocky Mountains
#5
I think if we had a “Come to Jesus” moment with regards to the EZ life we’ve become accustomed to... if these whiny little bitches would get squeezed by a dose of reality, they’d start singing a different tune...

A little belly hunger goes a long way towards appreciating what we once had once it’s gone.

"What a revoltin' development this is!"

China needs the US market way more than we need Chinese “stuff”.

Trump’s bringing manufacturing back to the US so we can support ourselves as we did for decades before.

That’s security.
 

Zed

The Bullish Bear.
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
17,888
Likes
18,399
Location
Watching the Sideshow!
#6
The bottom line is China's credit system is fragile and they know it. Remember, this is a one party state that believes economic growth below par will lead to big civil unrest. This is playing for all the marbles. China would probably emerge from a major crisis stronger than the US but with a different government and possibly a different structure. The risk is huge here, to expect radical moves would be niave. If it does get bad they are more likely to fight than kick off some uncontrollable sequence of financial events, that way they are probably going to keep control.
 

Someone_else

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
3,126
Likes
4,470
#7
- if China no longer wishes to hold Treasuries - what pray tell will they invest their current account surpluses in?
Gold. Russia is slowly doing this.
The US is the only game in town at that level. And of course China knows it.
I do not agree.
 

Zed

The Bullish Bear.
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
17,888
Likes
18,399
Location
Watching the Sideshow!
#8
Gold. Russia is slowly doing this.
If they sell UST's the current account surplus will not be long for this world as will their credit system, so, moot point. IMO it will only happen after a crisis has been triggered and then it will be about surviving the fallout.
 

Zed

The Bullish Bear.
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
17,888
Likes
18,399
Location
Watching the Sideshow!
#9
Nothing comes close to the UST debt market for depth, ease, and safety. The numbers are undeniable if you need to park billions safely in a hurry your options are very limited.
 

Cigarlover

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
8,699
Likes
17,537
#10
What I see with China is a longer term strategy. They are going into Africa, building infrastructure and developing farmland. The farm land is providing, food, jobs, and fiber for industry.
The US goes into africa, sells them guns, steaks the resources and calls it a 3rd world shithole.
I find it ironic that China is acting more like the US should be acting and the US acting more like a communist government hell bent on taking over the world.
 

Strawboss

Apocaloptimist
Site Mgr
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,587
Likes
17,185
#11
What I see with China is a longer term strategy. They are going into Africa, building infrastructure and developing farmland. The farm land is providing, food, jobs, and fiber for industry.
The US goes into africa, sells them guns, steaks the resources and calls it a 3rd world shithole.
I find it ironic that China is acting more like the US should be acting and the US acting more like a communist government hell bent on taking over the world.
Both Trump and Xi are playing the long game.

Trump has the advantage because Xi's long game depends on the status quo holding firm over the next 10 years or so...what Trump has effectively done is thrown a wrench into the works that is going to upset China's entire apple cart. It may not be a death blow to China...but it will definitely require some extensive retooling which will take many, many years.
 

Zed

The Bullish Bear.
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
17,888
Likes
18,399
Location
Watching the Sideshow!
#12
Quote...

As I explained in that entry, the real reason China cannot sell off its holdings of U.S. government bonds is because Chinese purchases were not made to accommodate U.S. needs. Rather, China made these purchases to accommodate a domestic demand deficiency in China: Chinese capital exports are simply the flip side of the country’s current account surplus, and without the former, they could not hold down the currency enough to permit the latter.
 

Attachments

ZZZZZ

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Messages
5,963
Likes
12,919
Location
Northern Arizona
#13
a trillion doesn't sound like much when Obama was running a trillion a year plus in deficits. It may be a minor kink in the wheel but certainly not catastrophic. I will admit however, that I am not an expert.
The sad thing is that the El Trumpster government is running deficits only a few ticks below Barry's rate.

Only a handful of our "leaders" realize that we're doomed, and there's nothing they can do about it. As Jim Rickards puts it, the snow and ice are already in place on the mountainside. It's just a question of what actually triggers the avalanche, and when. The what is not so important, the when is. Could be tomorrow, a year from now, five years, but it is inevitable.
.
.
 
Last edited:

ZZZZZ

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Messages
5,963
Likes
12,919
Location
Northern Arizona
#14
What I see with China is a longer term strategy. They are going into Africa, building infrastructure and developing farmland. The farm land is providing, food, jobs, and fiber for industry.
The US goes into africa, sells them guns, steaks the resources and calls it a 3rd world shithole.
I find it ironic that China is acting more like the US should be acting and the US acting more like a communist government hell bent on taking over the world.
Ding! Ding! Ding! we have a winner. :oriental:

Africa will replace the US as China's main export market. Africa needs so much more stuff to get its people the 20th century, let alone the 21st. Everything from shoes and socks to smart phones..

Africa is very lightly regulated. Just bribe a few corrupt politicians and you can import or export just about anything.
.
.
 

EO 11110

CENSORSHIP KILLS
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
17,361
Likes
15,598
Location
clown world
#15
lol....frbny trader can cover their action without putting his bagel down. they've shown their willingness to make moves in tens of trillions without breaking a sweat