• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

Durham: Clinton allies spied on the Executive Office of the President

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
70,702
Reaction score
156,061
Location
Rocky Mountains

Durham: Clinton allies spied on the Executive Office of the President​

And - will we see a Rodney Joffe indictment?​

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F70710e62-4791-42de-8e55-b956476aabf1_400x400.jpeg

Techno Fog


The Michael Sussmann case is heating up.

On February 11, 2022, Durham filed the Government’s Motion to Inquire into Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Michael Sussmann case. Read it here. As you might recall, Sussmann was charged with giving false statements to then-FBI General Counsel James Baker regarding the interests he was representing in pushing to the FBI the Alfa Bank/Trump Organization hoax. More background information on the Sussmann indictment can be found here.

The basis for the motion is that Sussmann’s current counsel, Latham & Watkins LLP (Latham) might have a conflict of interest because Latham previously represented Perkins Coie and Mark Elias “in this investigation.” It is alleged that Latham “likely possesses confidential knowledge about Perkins Coie’s role in, and views concerning, Sussmann’s past activities.” (Cleaned up.)

There might also be a conflict because Latham was representing both the Clinton Campaign and Hillary for America in the Special Counsel’s investigation. Durham observes that Latham’s duties to these former clients “might cause its interests to diverge from those of [Sussmann].”

Why might there be a conflict?

Because Durham might offer evidence at trial he obtained from the Clinton Campaign and Hillary for America.

We previously discussed how Rodney Joffe (identified as Tech Executive-1 in the Sussmann indictment and in the latest filing discussing the conflict) exploited proprietary – and perhaps classified – data provided by DARPA to further their own political attacks, and how that might result in charges. It was later confirmed that two former DARPA employees have given grand jury testimony, so it appears Durham is following this track.

I provide that background because of what we just learned. Durham also divulged, to an extent, that contractors and tech experts – those same people involved in the Alfa Bank hoax – essentially spied on President Trump.

According to Durham, Joffe and his associates exploited internet data from “the Executive Office of the President of the United States” to further their own political agenda. They had come to possess this data as part of a “sensitive arrangement” with the U.S. government. As Durham explains:

Joffe and his associates manipulated this information to further a conspiracy theory that Trump and those in Trump’s orbit were continuing their secret backchannels with the Russians. This was repackaged with the Alfa Bank hoax and given to Sussmann, who then laundered it to the CIA on February 9, 2017. Sussmann alleged to the CIA that the data showed “that Trump and/or his associates were using supposedly rare, Russian-made wireless phones in the vicinity of the White House and other locations.” Durham “identified no support for these allegations.”

One can’t help ask why Joffe (via Sussmann) risked legal exposure to continue to push false Trump-Russia allegations before and after the 2016 election. First to the FBI in 2016 then to the CIA in 2017. It seems that Joffe was desperate, and his desperation only increased after Trump’s election.

The source of Joffe’s desperation? It’s speculation at this point, but perhaps it goes to the origins of the purported Russia/DNC hack. To revise a previous question we have asked:
What if Crowdstrike was a patsy, there to unknowingly reach false conclusions of a “Russian hack” based on fraudulent information provided to them by Rodney Joffe and Perkins Coie and the DNC/Hillary Campaign?​
We don’t have an answer to that question - yet. Maybe we never will. But if anything, it seems likely that we will see an indictment of Rodney Joffe.

 

Buck

Mother Lode Found
Midas Supporter
Mother Lode
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
25,396
Reaction score
33,702
the question is: who's providing security?

moot point, but he's gotta stay alive and finish what he's started
 

Unca Walt

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
16,935
Reaction score
34,921
Location
South Floriduh

Lookit this, Pilgrims. I say the bolded part about spying on the Executive Office of the POTUS represents prima facie evidence of TREASON.

What say you?

"Fox News reports that at Sussman’s trial, Durham will establish that among the ill begotten data foraged by Tech Executive-1 and his associates is the domain name systems (DNS) internet traffic pertaining to “(i) a particular healthcare provider, (ii) Trump Tower, (iii) Donald Trump’s Central Park West apartment building, and (iv) the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP).”
 

EO 11110

(censor) from a long line of (censors)
Survivor
Site Supporter ++
Mother Lode
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
22,021
Reaction score
24,776
Location
clown world
more importantly, the communists are spying on you and i
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
70,702
Reaction score
156,061
Location
Rocky Mountains
This is the RED PILL everyone needs

The Surveillance and Political Spying Operations Highlighted by John Durham Today are the Tip of the Iceberg

February 12, 2022 | Sundance

Against the latest court filings by John Durham, highlighting the tip of the political surveillance iceberg, I have been asked to re-post the deep dive into the totality of the scale of the iceberg. I will add some of the latest information into the outline to show how it all connects.

Barack Obama and Eric Holder did not create a weaponized DOJ and FBI; instead, what they did was take the preexisting system and retool it, so the weapons only targeted one side of the political continuum.

Together they recalibrated the domestic surveillance capabilities, the internal spying systems, so that only their political opposition would be targeted. This point is where many people understandably get confused.

holder-and-obama.jpg

In the era shortly after 9/11, the DC national security apparatus was constructed to preserve continuity of government and simultaneously view all Americans as potential threats. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) were created specifically for this purpose.

What Barack Obama and Eric Holder did with that new construct was refine the internal targeting mechanisms so that only their ideological opposition became the target of the new national security system. This is a very important nuance to understand as you dig deeper into this research outline.

Washington DC created the modern national security apparatus immediately and hurriedly after 9/11/01. DHS came along in 2002 and within the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 the ODNI was formed. When Barack Obama and Eric Holder arrived a few years later, those newly formed institutions were viewed as opportunities to create a very specific national security apparatus that would focus almost exclusively against their political opposition.

The preexisting Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Dept of Justice (DOJ) were then repurposed to become two of the four pillars of the domestic national security apparatus. However, this new construct would have a targeting mechanism based on political ideology. The DHS, ODNI, DOJ and FBI became the four pillars of this new institution. Atop these pillars is where you will find the Fourth Branch of Government.

We were not sleeping when this happened, we were wide awake. However, we were stunningly distracted by the economic collapse that was taking place in 2006 and 2007 when the engineers behind Obama started to assemble the design. By the time Obama took office in 2009, we sensed something profound was shifting, but we can only see exactly what shifted in the aftermath. The four pillars were put into place, and a new Fourth Branch of Government was quietly created.

As time passed, and the system operators became familiar with their new tools, technology allowed the tentacles of the system to reach out and touch us. That is when we first started to notice that something very disconcerting was happening. Those four pillars are the root of it, and if we take the time to understand how the Fourth Branch originated, questions about this current state of perpetual angst will start to make sense.

Grab a cup of your favorite beverage and take a walk with me as we outline how this was put together. You might find many of the questions about our current state of political affairs beginning to make a lot more sense.

dc-eye-of-sauron.jpg

Remember, it is not my intent to outline the entire history of how we got to this place where the intelligence community now acts as the superseding fourth branch of government. Such an effort would be exhausting and likely take our discussion away from understanding the current dynamic.

History provided enough warnings from Dwight D. Eisenhower (military) to John F. Kennedy (CIA), to Richard Nixon (FBI), to all modern versions of warnings and frustrations from HPSCI Devin Nunes and ODNI Ric Grenell. None of those prior reference points are invalid, and all documented outlines of historic reference are likely true and accurate. However, a generational review is not useful, as the reference impacting us ‘right now‘ gets lost.

Instead, we pick up the expansive and weaponized intelligence system as it manifests after 9/11/01, and my goal is to highlight how the modern version of the total intelligence apparatus has now metastasized into a Fourth Branch of Government. It is this superseding branch that now touches and influences every facet of our life.

If we take the modern construct, originating at the speed of technological change, we can also see how the oversight or “check/balance” in our system of government became functionally obsolescent.

After many years of granular research about the intelligence apparatus inside our government, in the summer of 2020 I visited Washington DC to ask specific questions. My goal was to go where the influence agents within government actually operate, and to discover the people deep inside the institutions no one elected, and few people pay attention to.

deep-state-group-1-1024x993.jpg


It was during this process when I discovered how information is purposefully put into containment silos; essentially a formal process to block the flow of information between agencies and between the original branches. While frustrating to discover, the silo effect was important because understanding the communication between networks leads to our ability to reconcile conflict between what we perceive and what’s actually taking place.

After days of research and meetings in DC during 2020; amid a town that was serendipitously shut down due to COVID-19; I found a letter slid under the door of my room in a nearly empty hotel with an introduction of sorts. The subsequent discussions were perhaps the most important. After many hours of specific questions and answers on specific examples, I realized why our nation is in this mess. That is when I discovered the fourth and superseding branch of government, the Intelligence Branch.

I am going to explain how the Intelligence Branch works: (1) to control every other branch of government; (2) how it functions as an entirely independent branch of government with no oversight; (3) how and why it was created to be independent from oversight; (4) what is the current mission of the IC Branch, and most importantly (5) who operates it.

The Intelligence Branch is an independent functioning branch of government, it is no longer a subsidiary set of agencies within the Executive Branch as most would think. To understand the Intelligence Branch, we need to drop the elementary school civics class lessons about three coequal branches of government and replace that outlook with the modern system that created itself.

The Intelligence Branch functions much like the State Dept, through a unique set of public-private partnerships that support it. Big Tech industry collaboration with intelligence operatives is part of that functioning, almost like an NGO. However, the process is much more important than most think. In this problematic perspective of a corrupt system of government, the process is the flaw – not the outcome.

There are people making decisions inside this little known, unregulated and out-of-control branch of government that impact every facet of our lives.

None of the people operating deep inside the Intelligence Branch were elected; and our elected representative House members genuinely do not know how the system works. I assert this position affirmatively because I have talked to House and Senate staffers, including the chiefs of staff for multiple House & Senate committee seats. They are not malicious people; however, they are genuinely clueless of things that happen outside their silo. That is part of the purpose of me explaining it, with examples, in full detail with sunlight.

We begin….

In April of 2016, the FBI launched a counterintelligence operation against presidential candidate Donald Trump. The questioning about that operation is what New York Representative Elise Stefanik cites in March of 2017, approximately 11 months later (First Two Minutes).



Things to note:

♦ Notice how FBI Director James Comey just matter-of-factly explains no one outside the DOJ was informed about the FBI operation. Why? Because that’s just the way things are done. His justification for unilateral operations was “because of the sensitivity of the matter“, totally ignoring any constitutional or regulatory framework for oversight; because, well, quite simply, there isn’t any. The intelligence apparatus inside the DOJ/FBI can, and does, operate based on their own independent determinations of authority.

♦ Notice also how FBI Director Comey shares his perspective that informing the National Security Council (NSC) is the equivalent of notifying the White House. The FBI leadership expressly believe they bear no responsibility to brief the Chief Executive. As long as they tell some unknown, unelected, bureaucratic entity inside the NSC, their unwritten responsibility to inform the top of their institutional silo is complete. If the IC wants to carve out the Oval Office, they simply plant information inside the NSC and, from their perspective, their civic responsibility to follow checks-and-balances is complete. This is an intentional construct.

♦ Notice how Comey obfuscates notification to the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), by avoiding the fact James Clapper was the DNI from outset of the counterintelligence operation throughout the remainder of Obama’s term. When I get deeper into the process, we will understand how the Intelligence Branch has intentionally used the creation of the DNI position (established post 9/11/01) as a method to avoid oversight, not enhance it. Keeping an oblivious doofus like James Clapper in position held strategic value [Doofus Reminder HERE].

That video of James Comey being questioned by Elise Stefanik was the first example given to me by someone who knew the background of everything that was taking place preceding that March 20, 2017, hearing. That FBI reference point is a key to understand how the Intelligence Branch operates with unilateral authority above Congress (legislative branch), above the White House (executive branch), and even above the court system (judicial branch).

Also, watch this short video of James Clapper because it is likely many readers have forgotten, and likely even more readers have never seen it. Watch closely how then White House national security adviser John Brennan is responding in that video. This is before Brennan became CIA Director, this is when Brennan was helping Barack Obama put the pillars into place. WATCH:




[Sidebar: Every time I post this video it gets scrubbed from YouTube (example), so save it if you ever want to see it again.]

The video of James Clapper highlights how the ODNI position (created with good national security intention) ended up becoming the fulcrum for modern weaponization, and is now an office manipulated by agencies with a vested interest in retaining power. The Intelligence Branch holds power over the ODNI through their influence and partnership with the body that authorizes the power within it, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI).

Factually, the modern intelligence apparatus uses checks and balances in their favor. The checks create silos of proprietary information, classified information, vaults of information that work around oversight issues. The silos are part of the problem.

Ironically, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence was created in the aftermath of 9/11/01 expressly to eliminate the silos of information which they felt led to a domestic terrorist attack that could have been prevented. The ODNI was created specifically upon the recommendation of the 9/11 commission.

The intent was to create a central hub of intelligence information, inside the Executive Branch, where the CIA, NSA, DoD, DoS, and DIA could deposit their unique intelligence products and a repository would be created so that domestic intelligence operations, like the DOJ and FBI could access them when needed to analyze threats to the U.S. This, they hoped, would ensure the obvious flags missed in the 9/11 attacks would not be missed again.

The DNI office created a problem for those who operate in the shadows of proprietary information. You’ll see how it was critical to install a person uniquely skilled in being an idiot, James Clapper, into that willfully blind role while intelligence operatives worked around the office to assemble the Intelligence Branch of Government.

• The last federal budget that flowed through the traditional budgetary process was signed into law in September of 2007 for fiscal year 2008 by George W. Bush. Every budget since then has been a fragmented process of continuing resolutions and individual spending bills.

Why does this matter? Because many people think defunding the Intelligence Community is a solution; it is not…. at least, not yet. Worse yet, the corrupt divisions deep inside the U.S. intelligence system can now fund themselves from multinational private sector partnerships (banks, corporations and foreign entities).

• When Democrats took over the House of Representatives in January 2007, they took office with a plan. Nancy Pelosi became Speaker, and Democrats controlled the Senate where Harry Reid was Majority Leader. Barack Obama was a junior senator from Illinois.

Pelosi and Reid intentionally did not advance a budget in 2008 (for fiscal year 2009) because their plan included installing Barack Obama (and all that came with him) with an open checkbook made even more lucrative by a worsening financial crisis and a process called baseline budgeting. Baseline budgeting means the prior fiscal year budget is accepted as the starting point for the next year budget. All previous expenditures are baked into the cake within baseline budgeting.

Massive bailouts preceded Obama’s installation due to U.S. economic collapse, and massive bailouts continued after his installation. This is the ‘never let a crisis go to waste’ aspect. TARP (Troubled Asset Recovery Program), auto bailouts (GM), and the massive stimulus spending bill, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA, ie. those shovel ready jobs) were all part of the non budget spending. The federal reserve assisted with Quantitative Easing (QE1 and QE2) as congress passed various Porkulous spending bills further spending and replacing the formal budget process.

Note: There has never been a budget passed in the normal/traditional process since September of 2007.

• While Obama’s radical ‘transformation‘ was triggered across a broad range of government institutions, simultaneously spending on the U.S. military was cut, but spending on the intelligence apparatus expanded. We were all distracted by Obamacare, and the Republican party wanted to keep us that way. However, in the background there was a process of transformation taking place that included very specific action by Eric Holder and targeted effort toward the newest executive agency the ODNI.

holder-obama-3.jpg


The people behind Obama, those same people now behind Joe Biden, knew from years of strategic planning that ‘radical transformation’ would require control over specific elements inside the U.S. government. Eric Holder played a key role in his position as U.S. Attorney General in the DOJ.


GOBS more at link
 
Last edited:

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
70,702
Reaction score
156,061
Location
Rocky Mountains
Prophetic

Screen Shot 2022-02-13 at 9.53.24 AM.png
 

ABC123

Mother Lode Found
Midas Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
12,151
Reaction score
27,845
1644792610901.png

https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1492941012511215618





Sussmann’s) Congressional testimony..was knowingly + intentionally misleading..defendant billed work..to Clinton Campaign” + deceptive statements to media NOTE: Durham appears to further lay foundation for more charges/broader conspiracy via @RobLegare
 

oldgaranddad

Platinum Bling
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
7,054
Reaction score
15,601
Location
On the top shelf.
I wonder if Durham is setting up the foundations for a RICO prosecution of the Clinton establishment? It would certainly lower the bar for burden of proof.

Though I did notice the lack of MSM coverage. I wonder how long it will take the MSM to capitulate and start reporting. The MSM must be staying up all hours of the night trying to figure out how to spin this.
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
70,702
Reaction score
156,061
Location
Rocky Mountains

The Media Blackout of Durham's Bombshell Report Alleging Clinton Campaign 'Infiltrated' Trump Tower​

BY RICK MORAN FEB 13, 2022

A filing by special counsel John Durham — alleging Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign paid a technology company to establish an “inference” that the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia so she could win an election — has not generated much excitement in the mainstream media.

Perhaps because the story is somewhat complex, the media has decided not to report on it? Indeed, naming all the players and their actions is a chore, if you read the few media outlets on the right that are covering it.

It’s sort of boring — until you realize the staggering implications of what’s being alleged.

Durham is saying that the Democratic candidate for president in 2016 engaged in a criminal conspiracy to infiltrate the opposition’s most sensitive, compartmentalized information and tried to manipulate data and information to politically damage her opponent.

Nothing to see here. Move along.

CNN is full of stories about Donald Trump’s clogged toilet, but nothing about the Durham probe. The Washington Post is equally silent. As are The New York Times and the Associated Press.

Will these brave, courageous purveyors of truth cover the fact that Trump special prosecutor Robert Mueller was hoodwinked by these shenanigans? That Mueller was kept in the dark about the surveillance from which some of his “evidence” was obtained?

 

Voodoo

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
7,599
Reaction score
12,625
Location
Deep Underground Bunker

Voodoo

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
7,599
Reaction score
12,625
Location
Deep Underground Bunker
I wonder if Durham is setting up the foundations for a RICO prosecution of the Clinton establishment? It would certainly lower the bar for burden of proof.

Though I did notice the lack of MSM coverage. I wonder how long it will take the MSM to capitulate and start reporting. The MSM must be staying up all hours of the night trying to figure out how to spin this.

I mean if they dont take down these mafia rule "charities" then it would be a complete fail IMO.
 

Unca Walt

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
16,935
Reaction score
34,921
Location
South Floriduh
Pelosi Is Having Her Watergate --

The Capitol Police allegedly entered the congressman’s (Rep Troy Nehls) office without his knowledge or permission and photographed sensitive documents. They then allegedly returned a few days later dressed as construction workers and began grilling a staffer about the contents of the illegally photographed documents. This, of course, rivals Watergate, but it may also open the door for a means of bringing these Gestapo tactics before the public where they belong.

The actions of the Capitol Police may well have violated the rights protected under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. §1983. It is also conceivable that the civil provisions of the RICO Act could have been triggered. Filing under the civil provisions of the RICO statutes would not involve the DoJ, who is highly unlikely to prosecute the criminal aspects.

The filing of a civil action in federal court under this code section would entitle the plaintiffs to discovery procedures under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Written interrogatories, request for production of documents and depositions could be the sunbeam into this mess. It might force someone to assert Fifth Amendment privilege, which could be difficult to explain in the court of public opinion. Surely there is surveillance video of a congressman’s offices, especially after hours. Who controls these and where are they? Are any “missing?” With an unbiased judge, the defendants should be forced to answer the discovery without hiding behind technicalities.

MOAR: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/02/pelosis_watergate.html
 

oldgaranddad

Platinum Bling
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
7,054
Reaction score
15,601
Location
On the top shelf.
No one important will see jail time. Maybe some poor schmuck gets caught but the Clintons and Pelosi go free.

Sad but I have to agree.
 

oldgaranddad

Platinum Bling
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
7,054
Reaction score
15,601
Location
On the top shelf.
Awright, I say all three of youse are wrong.
I hope I am but the past has been a good predictor of the future when it comes to this specific topic.
 

DodgebyDave

Metal Messiah
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
16,476
Reaction score
23,330
Nobody died at Watergate....................................

The Clintons will have their day of accountability..........in a sane world.........how can they not

(walt...........I saw a plate of birdseed in the road today. Ok, maybe it was a hubcap. I didn't get out to look for sure)

Are we at full cartoon zombie apocalypse? Stay tuned for fun and prizes!
 
Last edited:

Unca Walt

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
16,935
Reaction score
34,921
Location
South Floriduh
Nobody died at Watergate....................................
Do you nabobs of negativity really think

1. the laptop
2. the forensic voter evidence in multiple states
3. the politicalization of three-letter agencies
4. the open borders
5. the crazed Covid enforcers
6. the evil Covid inventors
7. the BLM pushers
8. the Fake News exposed so totally
9. the proofs of multiple countries affecting the voting counts
[
[
[
178. the actual records of HRC paying for spying on a sitting president for the express purpose of removing him from office
179. the video-documented extortion bragging by Biden in Ukraine
180. the burning of the cities
181. the release of murderers to murder again
182 to 12,986...

...do you really think these are going to go away, and it is all over, boohoo? Really? Now that even C-fucking-NN has taken official note of Biden and FOX News is broadcasting about how Hillary can be up for treason with the newly-relased BOMB from Barr.

Grow some teeth. Put on your war face. Stop weeping in your soy milk. Look at the stone fact that you are most ricky-tick in a world on the cusp of an enormous, thoroughly basic change. A year ago, the concept of truckers bringing a country to a screeching halt would be laughable.

There will be changes that are -- for now -- outside your current thinking. But you'll be there to see them. Historic time is... right now.
 

DodgebyDave

Metal Messiah
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
16,476
Reaction score
23,330
I just think that the USA, History and Justice would be best served if she did the Warden Norton
 

DodgebyDave

Metal Messiah
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
16,476
Reaction score
23,330
I would like to think that, other than the bullet, the last thing to go through her head was how in the hell did Trump ever get the best of her!
 

Lancers32

You know...the thing
Site Supporter ++
Platinum Bling
Joined
May 10, 2020
Messages
5,919
Reaction score
8,333
Location
NC
Do you nabobs of negativity really think

1. the laptop
2. the forensic voter evidence in multiple states
3. the politicalization of three-letter agencies
4. the open borders
5. the crazed Covid enforcers
6. the evil Covid inventors
7. the BLM pushers
8. the Fake News exposed so totally
9. the proofs of multiple countries affecting the voting counts
[
[
[
178. the actual records of HRC paying for spying on a sitting president for the express purpose of removing him from office
179. the video-documented extortion bragging by Biden in Ukraine
180. the burning of the cities
181. the release of murderers to murder again
182 to 12,986...

...do you really think these are going to go away, and it is all over, boohoo? Really? Now that even C-fucking-NN has taken official note of Biden and FOX News is broadcasting about how Hillary can be up for treason with the newly-relased BOMB from Barr.

Grow some teeth. Put on your war face. Stop weeping in your soy milk. Look at the stone fact that you are most ricky-tick in a world on the cusp of an enormous, thoroughly basic change. A year ago, the concept of truckers bringing a country to a screeching halt would be laughable.

There will be changes that are -- for now -- outside your current thinking. But you'll be there to see them. Historic time is... right now.

All that but common sense and justice went out the back door.
 

the_shootist

Good luck!
Eagle
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
83,250
Reaction score
184,114
All that but common sense and justice went out the back door.
We've waited over a year to fix the election and we're still talking about it
We've been waiting on Durham for over 3 years and we're still talking about it
We've waited over two years, until 10's of millions of people were poisoned by their own government and healthcare providers to begin to understand that the pandemic/vaxx was a hoax...and we're still talking about it and still people are taking the poison.

I'm tired of people telling me to be patient. I'm tired of being called a non believer by people looking down their noses at me because I'm not drinking the koolaid! I'm not at all satisfied with talk and endless internet articles.

I'm here and I'm not going anywhere. I don't give a crap about hearing what might be going on in the background. That ship has sailed. Until we see the actual events unfolding before our eyes this Durham crap is still all just fluff and fodder to me
 

Joe King

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
13,727
Reaction score
18,009
Location
Instant Gratification Land
Until we see the actual events unfolding before our eyes
It kinda is, ain't it?

Albeit slowly, but all that has been happening is that more and more info is in fact coming out.

If it were going the other way, we'd be hearing info intended to put it all to rest. That there was nothing there.
....and that is not what has been happening.

Just try to be patient and we will see where this ends up going.
....same as with the pog.
 

ZZZZZ

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Messages
10,159
Reaction score
23,782
Location
Northern Arizona
We've waited over a year to fix the election and we're still talking about it
We've been waiting on Durham for over 3 years and we're still talking about it
We've waited over two years, until 10's of millions of people were poisoned by their own government and healthcare providers to begin to understand that the pandemic/vaxx was a hoax...and we're still talking about it and still people are taking the poison.

I'm tired of people telling me to be patient. I'm tired of being called a non believer by people looking down their noses at me because I'm not drinking the koolaid! I'm not at all satisfied with talk and endless internet articles.

I'm here and I'm not going anywhere. I don't give a crap about hearing what might be going on in the background. That ship has sailed. Until we see the actual events unfolding before our eyes this Durham crap is still all just fluff and fodder to me
No doubt Bull Durham is getting paid by the hour. Probably north of $1,000 per.
.
.
 

ZZZZZ

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Messages
10,159
Reaction score
23,782
Location
Northern Arizona
Nobody died at Watergate....................................

The Clintons will have their day of accountability..........in a sane world.........how can they not

(walt...........I saw a plate of birdseed in the road today. Ok, maybe it was a hubcap. I didn't get out to look for sure)

Are we at full cartoon zombie apocalypse? Stay tuned for fun and prizes!

Forget the patio set behind Door #3, Monty, I'll just take Carol. o_O cool:

CarolMonty2m.jpg

.
.
 
Last edited: