• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

Mass non-white immigration doomed Great Britain to conflict

edsl48

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
2,638
Likes
5,035
#1
Posted on June 4, 2019
Enoch Was Right
Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, June 4, 2019

Rivers of Blood” is a misnomer. It should be called the “Preventable Evils” speech. Enoch Powell said forestalling preventable evils was the “supreme function of statesmanship,” and warned that Great Britain was importing racial conflict: “That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic . . . is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect.”
The government didn’t listen. The British let in non-whites and now face bitter racial division and endless an endless war against “racism.” The annual Stephen Lawrence Day combats “institutional racism.” State broadcaster BBC discriminatesagainst whites. Leftist violence and government repression suppress nationalists.

Enoch Powell. (Credit Image: © PA Wire via ZUMA Press)
One practitioner of the resulting anarcho-tyranny is London mayor Sadiq Kahn. In a column for The Guardian, he said it’s “un-British” to welcome President Trump because “our values”—“our hard won rights and freedoms” must be defended “from the rise of the far right.”
Rights and freedoms? No—censorship, surveillance, and sharp limits on the freedoms of speech, association, and self defense. Great Britain has more surveillance cameras per capita than any other country but China, and Mayor Khan wants to regulate “hate speech” even more tightly. He attacks President Trump and Twitter trolls, but knife crime, burglary, and murders are all on the rise. London is both Orwellian and chaotic.
It’s changing in other ways, according to comedian John Cleese, who says the capital is “no longer an English city.” Mayor Khan to retorted that “diversity is our strength” and said Mr. Cleese was “in character as Basil Fawlty,” a conservative buffoon. British satirists such as Monty Python and Harry Enfield (another comedian accused of racism) used to lampoon the British Establishment. Today’s establishment can’t take the heat.
The British media scorned Mr. Cleese. The television show “Good Morning Britain” hosted a panel that mostly criticized him. Activist Dr. Shola Mos-Shogbamimu declared that “Britishness is not determined by the color of my skin.” It’s about “integration and inclusion.” Of course, Dr. Mos-Shogbamimu promotes intersectionality, hates Brexit, and wants diversity on British banknotes.
Black Labour MP David Lammy piled on. “I am as English as you mate,” he tweeted to Mr. Cleese. “Deal with it.” Mr. Lammy’s career highlights include calling Oxford a “bastion of white, middle class, southern privilege” and saying the school was “failing badly” because it didn’t have enough blacks. He also wants an “ethnically representative judiciary and magistracy.”
Mr. Lammy compared Eurosceptic Tories to Nazis—and later said his comments weren’t “strong enough.” “I’m an ethnic minority,” he once said to explain why he doesn’t like the German Alternative for Deutchland. Mr. Lammy clearly sees himself as black first, British second.
Mr. Cleese has muddled views. He criticized political correctness, defended cultural preference, and expressed nostalgiafor historic English culture, denounced “guilt by association,” and suggested race is biological. But he also groveled.
Another British icon, the singer known as Morrissey, is more explicitly political. He isn’t conservative, but his work is occasionally identitarian. In “Irish Blood, English Heart,” he yearns to be “standing by the flag not feeling shameful, racist or partial.” “National Front Disco” is about friends and family mourning that they “lost our boy” to nationalism, but the song explains the yearning of idealists who are homesick for a country they never knew: “There’s a country, you don’t live there, but one day you would like to, and if you show them what you’re made of, oh, then you might do.” Whether young nationalists are tragic heroes or deluded losers, Morrissey is a better guide to their motivations than most journalists.
Recently, Morrissey wore a badge for the nationalist political party For Britain during a media appearance and explainedthe party wasn’t racist or fascist. In response, Spillers Records in Cardiff—the oldest record store in Britain—stopped stocking his music. Merseyrail, a British commuter train, banned Morrissey ads because they did not reflect “its values.” (Morrissey also made a stink by mentioning Faith Goldy at a concert in Toronto.)
Morrissey was a counter-culture icon. By-the-numbers leftist musician Billy Bragg says Morrissey, a onetime member of The Smiths, is “betraying those fans, betraying his legacy, and empowering the very people Smiths fans were brought into being to oppose.” Fans are not “created” for a political agenda, and Mr. Bragg doesn’t seem to realize he is now part of the humorless establishment rather than a rebel.
“Diversity” means conflict in Britain, just as it does everywhere else. David Lammy and Dr. Shola Mos-Shogbamimu claim to be British when it’s convenient, but campaign against British tradition and history. They insult dissenters like John Cleese or Morrissey. Muslim Mayor Khan defines British “values.”
Enoch was right: Mass non-white immigration doomed Great Britain to conflict. The cities are crime-ridden, the surveillance dystopian, whites learn shame and non-whites learn resentment. And South Africa shows that even after whites surrender, there will be no “unity” or “equality.”
The way to win the “diversity” game is not to play it. If Britain had heeded Enoch Powell, some would have cried “racism,” but today there would be far fewer cries of “racism.” Poland and Hungary today face cries of “racism” precisely because they see what is happening in places like Britain.
The preventable evil took root. The struggle to remove it will be hard. Before the fight can begin, the British must recognize they have a right to exist. They have a right to their homeland. “England for the English”—and that doesn’t include David Lammy.
 

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
35,032
Likes
47,363
#2
There is no Great Britain or United Kingdom. Those days are long gone! The Brits have been beaten back to their little island next to Europe which is not much bigger that Illinois. England has become widely insignificant in world events and no one really fears them any longer! Hell, their people have become so cucked that they aren't even allowed to own a butter knife without a license. Tell me THAT'S not fucked up!
 

edsl48

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
2,638
Likes
5,035
#3
NY Times: Mass Immigration Is a Fitting Racial Punishment For Europeans
What’s the old saying?

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Ever since the Baby Boomer generation, most White Americans have become naive, deracinated expressive individualists who live purely in the present in their consumer society which is in an advanced state of degeneration. In contrast, millions of people in the Third World are still living in poverty and nursing any number of historical grievances against modern day Westerners.

I’m referring to people like this guy.

Suketu Mehta:

“There is a lot of debate these days about whether the United States owes its African-American citizens reparations for slavery. It does. But there is a far bigger bill that the United States and Europe have run up: what they owe to other countries for their colonial adventures, for the wars they imposed on them, for the inequality they have built into the world order, for the excess carbon they have dumped into the atmosphere.
The creditor countries aren’t seriously suggesting that the West send sacks of gold bullion every year to India or Nigeria. Their people are asking for fairness: for the borders of the rich countries to be opened to goods and people, to Indian textiles as well as Nigerian doctors. In seeking to move, they are asking for immigration as reparations.
Today, a quarter of a billion people are migrants. They are moving because the rich countries have stolen the future of the poor countries. Whether it is Iraqis and Syrians fleeing the effects of illegal American wars, or Africans seeking to work for their former European colonial masters, or Guatemalans and Hondurans trying to get into the country that peddles them guns and buys their drugs: They are coming here because we were there.
Before you ask them to respect our borders, ask yourself: Has the West ever respected anyone’s borders? …”
Suketu Mehta is the author of “This Land is Our Land: An Immigrant’s Manifesto.” The article has a tone dripping with contempt and essentially says that the Third World is coming to colonize the West in much the same way that the Europeans colonized and displaced the American Indians.

There is one big problem with this article: we live in the 21st century and no one who is alive today who is a White Millennial has ever been a slaveowner. No White Millennial has ever lived under segregation. No White Millennial has ever fought the Indians to conquer the West. No White Millennial has ever colonized the Third World. It was naively assumed by our liberal establishment that all these historical grievances had been resolved and as a society we had “progressed” beyond that. WRONG!

According to Suketu Mehta, it is time for the West to pay up, which is to say, it is time for White Millennials and Zoomers and their children and grandchildren to shoulder the burden of being displaced from their own lands by a neverending tidal wave of Third World immigrants.

What should our response to that be? There will be SJWs on the Left who will agree with Mehta that the West is guilty of all these crimes and that social justice requires us to shoulder the burden of this neverending tidal wave of Third World immigration. Similarly, there will be other Millennials and Zoomers who will respond to that sort of argument by rejecting White guilt and shrugging off liberalism. They will conclude that justice actually requires us to protect those closest to us who are own children and grandchildren from a menacing threat that has a racial axe to grind against us.

If you want to understand why right leaning White Millennials and Zoomers are becoming radicalized and rejecting liberalism and turning to fascism, then all you have to do is read The New York Times because the answer is published there in its pages on a daily basis. We’re sick and tired of being lectured about “racism” by people who publish anti-White articles like this one.

Note: The failure of utopian experiments in multiculturalism and multiracialism is a recurring theme in American history from the time of King Philip’s War to Reconstruction.


http://www.occidentaldissent.com/20...is-a-fitting-racial-punishment-for-europeans/
 

Thecrensh

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
7,017
Likes
9,473
#4
NY Times: Mass Immigration Is a Fitting Racial Punishment For Europeans
What’s the old saying?

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Ever since the Baby Boomer generation, most White Americans have become naive, deracinated expressive individualists who live purely in the present in their consumer society which is in an advanced state of degeneration. In contrast, millions of people in the Third World are still living in poverty and nursing any number of historical grievances against modern day Westerners.

I’m referring to people like this guy.

Suketu Mehta:

“There is a lot of debate these days about whether the United States owes its African-American citizens reparations for slavery. It does. But there is a far bigger bill that the United States and Europe have run up: what they owe to other countries for their colonial adventures, for the wars they imposed on them, for the inequality they have built into the world order, for the excess carbon they have dumped into the atmosphere.
The creditor countries aren’t seriously suggesting that the West send sacks of gold bullion every year to India or Nigeria. Their people are asking for fairness: for the borders of the rich countries to be opened to goods and people, to Indian textiles as well as Nigerian doctors. In seeking to move, they are asking for immigration as reparations.
Today, a quarter of a billion people are migrants. They are moving because the rich countries have stolen the future of the poor countries. Whether it is Iraqis and Syrians fleeing the effects of illegal American wars, or Africans seeking to work for their former European colonial masters, or Guatemalans and Hondurans trying to get into the country that peddles them guns and buys their drugs: They are coming here because we were there.
Before you ask them to respect our borders, ask yourself: Has the West ever respected anyone’s borders? …”
Suketu Mehta is the author of “This Land is Our Land: An Immigrant’s Manifesto.” The article has a tone dripping with contempt and essentially says that the Third World is coming to colonize the West in much the same way that the Europeans colonized and displaced the American Indians.

There is one big problem with this article: we live in the 21st century and no one who is alive today who is a White Millennial has ever been a slaveowner. No White Millennial has ever lived under segregation. No White Millennial has ever fought the Indians to conquer the West. No White Millennial has ever colonized the Third World. It was naively assumed by our liberal establishment that all these historical grievances had been resolved and as a society we had “progressed” beyond that. WRONG!

According to Suketu Mehta, it is time for the West to pay up, which is to say, it is time for White Millennials and Zoomers and their children and grandchildren to shoulder the burden of being displaced from their own lands by a neverending tidal wave of Third World immigrants.

What should our response to that be? There will be SJWs on the Left who will agree with Mehta that the West is guilty of all these crimes and that social justice requires us to shoulder the burden of this neverending tidal wave of Third World immigration. Similarly, there will be other Millennials and Zoomers who will respond to that sort of argument by rejecting White guilt and shrugging off liberalism. They will conclude that justice actually requires us to protect those closest to us who are own children and grandchildren from a menacing threat that has a racial axe to grind against us.

If you want to understand why right leaning White Millennials and Zoomers are becoming radicalized and rejecting liberalism and turning to fascism, then all you have to do is read The New York Times because the answer is published there in its pages on a daily basis. We’re sick and tired of being lectured about “racism” by people who publish anti-White articles like this one.

Note: The failure of utopian experiments in multiculturalism and multiracialism is a recurring theme in American history from the time of King Philip’s War to Reconstruction.


http://www.occidentaldissent.com/20...is-a-fitting-racial-punishment-for-europeans/

"rich countries have stolen the future of the poor countries"

Typical manure spouted by Marxists. There are poor countries that were never involved in "colonialism". There are rich countries that were also never involved in "colonialism". Typical misinformation.
 

Bigjon

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
2,882
Likes
2,665
#5
It's pretty hard to remember the past when your supposed newspapers never printed the reports of it's reporters.
What most people believe is their past is a fabrication of propaganda and lies.
Read The Controversy of Zion.
 

ZZZZZ

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Messages
3,706
Likes
7,817
Location
Northern Arizona
#6
It's pretty hard to remember the past when your supposed newspapers never printed the reports of it's reporters.
What most people believe is their past is a fabrication of propaganda and lies.
Read The Controversy of Zion.
“Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.”

― George Orwell, 1984
.
.
 

blackgoldgq

Seeker
Seeker
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
254
Likes
150
#7
There is no Great Britain or United Kingdom. Those days are long gone! The Brits have been beaten back to their little island next to Europe which is not much bigger that Illinois. England has become widely insignificant in world events and no one really fears them any longer! Hell, their people have become so cucked that they aren't even allowed to own a butter knife without a license. Tell me THAT'S not fucked up!
There is no smoke without fire....


Britain could not run its scam and fraud of empire on the African & Asian Colonies it had forever, it only lasted about 50-60 years and the First and Second European War(s) for World Domination (1914-1918 & 1939-45) exposed the lie of so called civilisation mandate and white man’s burden that the Brits pushed. You have to remember that Argentina was more prosperous and richer than any European Country before the 2nd European War for World Domination broke out in 1939. Most African and Asians that fought in the 2nd European War for world Domination in the British ranks were the ones who said enough is enough as they realised that this small island in Northern Europe was Running an Economic Extraction scam on all of them from the South East Asian shores of Papa New Guinea thru India, Pakistan, Kenya, to the West African Shores of Ghana. They all were in the same fighting ranks with English, Scottish, Irish & Welsh Military Men and when they saw that the war was not for their benefit that’s when the final wool was pulled from their eyes and they realised that this is just a War among Europeans of who will lead the charge of Dominating the Globe. So now independence movement started from after 1945 with India in 1947 and guess what Britain now had to pay the Premium price for all those colonial land resources and its economy was in shatters, so what does one do, develop another scheme and get the former Colonist to come to your land and work for you!!!. Great Diabolical scheme as it’s a scheme of keep your friends close and your enemies (i.e. Former Colonial Subjects) closer so that you will have access to their resources still and also benefit from those Colonist that now live in your Land. Looking on it on averages it has been Britain and its Subject States i.e. Canada, Australia and New Zealand that have Benefited most for the Post 1945 World Order as its Economy and subliminal Influence is stronger than ever before and it still has access to its former colonies plus states it did not even colonise by "Peace-Meal State-Craft-Befriend/Divide and Conquer Diplomacy".

So in Summary the UK is doing Fine when you weigh up the Pros and Cons, it has a Population of 75 Million of which 3-4 Million is Immigrants And of that 3-4 Million, 2, 5 Million are from African, Asia and Latin America with the Rest being from European Countries.

If they had not accepted Immigration and had pursed and isolationist policy they would have been relegated to a quiet State of Existence like New Zealand at its lowest and Australia at its highest.

So there you have it....the World Revolves and the moves on and the Pendulum of change and growth moves on as it has now moved to the Far East (Asia) which is pulling the Middle East, Central Asia, Africa, Latin America and even Eastern Europe into its Orbit now.....

So the Outpost of Roman Conquest in 50AD (Britannia) that began to Conquer and plunder for economic gain in 1600 (England) is now
Being reduced again to just an Outpost of Economic has been Engine of Global Change...


#Just an Observant African American Ex-Military Personal that lived on all Continents
 

Mujahideen

Black Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
11,221
Likes
20,556
Location
Wakanda
#8
According to the internet:

These are the 22 countries that Britain hasn't invaded : Andorra, Belarus, Bolivia, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Guatemala, Ivory Coast ,Kyrgyzstan, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Mali, Marshall Islands, Monaco, Mongolia, Paraguay, Sao Tome and Principe, Sweden, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Vatican City.

Now England is being invaded; no 2nd amendment either.