Thomas Clark Nelson - How Congress Conned You Out Of Your Sovereignty

[Bigjon]

Published on Jul 1, 2013
The source material is listed on the last slide.
A narrated Power-Point presentation that exposes the Matrix. How the original status sovereign American nationals were over-layed and duped into the Federal jurisdiction of the District of Columbia, re; the Social Security franchise contract, Re-defining of the word "state" (Union) into a term of art "State" (District of Columbia), use of the voluntary Zip Code (Federal Area), use of the capital two-letter STATE identifier on mail addresses, and information about the Drivers License. There are remedies offered in the articles listed at the webpage on the last slide. Best viewed in full screen. Please share with your friends.

 

[Bigjon]

Confirmation from another researcher and author confirming much of Judge Anna’s work.

Posted on June 4, 2016by David Robinson

By Paul Stramer | pstramer@gmail.com

I get this all the time. People say, “But you and Anna don’t prove your work.” or “You are the only ones saying this and you don’t include any cites.” or ” Where is your proof about jurisdiction” and much more.

US Civil Flag

So I thought you could use some alternate sources from people who have come to the same conclusions as we have although they are from completely different backgrounds, and paths. They might not coincide 100% with our work, but most of their conclusions are the same.

So here are some examples from another Author. His name is Thomas Clark Nelson.
I won’t publish anything about who he is. You can find that yourself. But just LOOK AT HIS WORK.
Wow. Look at the effort and research he has put into this. Follow some of the references and you will see what I mean. His work has the ring of truth, and is well documented.

http://annavonreitz.com/nelson/whythe14thamendmentisapoliticaltrojanhorse.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/nelson/purging.pdf

http://annavonreitz.com/nelson/indisputablefacts.pdf

To find more of Thomas Clark Nelson’s work please go here:

https://archive.org/search.php?query=creator:"Thomas+Clark+Nelson"

 

[michael59]

Ok buddy, this human derailed at reside.

It is known that one resides or has residence in its masters bosom. So a citizen has a residence.

You know-how is this human supposed to negotiate the trials and pitfall of this big discombobulation if people cannot use the correct terminology?

If one is going to be perfect then one cannot be plagued by ferries or ferry dust.

And, and person is plural as well as singular, yes a county can be plural as well as singular, same as a state same as..... the list is endless.

If something is supposed to be all encompassing then it should include all.

 

[Bigjon]

When you go to the sea shore you reside there for a week or two, it's temporary, as in not a permanent home. Your permanent home is your domicile.

It all depends on who is defining the words.

 

[TRYNEIN]

How much proof does one need in order to believe that the 14th Amendment created 2 classes of citizens???




Two years after the 14th Article of Amendment to the Constitution was said to have been ratified, this very interesting decision was promulgated by the California Supreme Court:

I have no doubt that those born in the Territories, or in the District of Columbia, are so far citizens as to entitle them to the protection guaranteed to citizens of the United States in the Constitution, and to the shield of nationality abroad; but it is evident that they have not the political rights which are vested in citizens of the tates. They are not constituents of any community in which is vested any sovereign power of government. Their position partakes more of the character of subjects than of citizens. They are subject to the laws of the [federal] United States, but have no voice in its management. If they are allowed to make laws, the validity of these laws is derived from the sanction of Government in which they are not represented. Mere citizenship they may have, but the political rights of [C]itizens they cannot enjoy until they are organized into a State, and admitted into the union.
[People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 342 [1870]. (Emphasis added.)]


and then again as late as 1975:

"I cannot believe that any court, in full possession of its faculties, could honestly hold that the amendment was properly approved and adopted."
[State v. Phillips, Pacific Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 540, page 941-942 (1975)]





The first clause of the fourteenth amendment of the federal Constitution created two classes of citizens, one of the United States and the other of the state.
[Cory v. Carter, 48 Ind. 427, 17 Am. Rep. 738]


There are, then, two classes of citizens; one of the United States, and one of the state. One class of citizenship may exist in a person without the other, as in the case of a resident of the District of Columbia.
[Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County, 48 So. 788, 790, 791, 160 Ala. 155]



"The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship."
Supreme Court: Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226:




"The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress."
U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)


“...he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State,...” “One may be a citizen of a State an yet not a citizen of the United States”.
McDonel v. The State, 90 Ind. 320 (1883)


“That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state,...”
Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)


"A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government ..."
Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383



"the term 'citizen' in the United States, is analogous to the term `subject' in common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government."
State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122:


I have no idea how that happened

 

[michael59]

Mine is a more ancient definition but interestingly it has a lot to do with the 14th.

A slave resides in his master's bosom. So his residence is upon his master's land.

When you or I say that we reside then we are saying under the protection of... at this or that place.

Gots 2 B careful using them words.